Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Pet Food News

Consumers v Party Animal Pet Food

Another class action lawsuit filed “on behalf of consumers who purchased Party Animal brand dog foods labeled as organic.”

Another class action lawsuit filed “on behalf of consumers who purchased Party Animal brand dog foods labeled as organic.”

From the press release

Party Animal “Cocolicious” Chicken and Beef purchased by Ms. Black was found to allegedly contain Pentobarbital, an animal euthanasia drug. Additionally, the lawsuit alleges that the Party Animal brand dog foods in question are otherwise mislabeled as containing certain healthful ingredients that are not in fact included in the pet food as advertised.

The lawsuit alleges that an Illinois-based private label pet food manufacturer named Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Company (“Evanger’s”) manufactured and canned the Party Animal “Cocolicious” branded food, and alleges that meats from dead animal processors were used to make the “organic” pet food despite being tainted with the toxic levels of Pentobarbital. Both Party Animal, Inc. and Evanger’s are named as Defendants in the case.

Roger S. Braugh, Jr., counsel for Ms. Black, stated, “We are determined to fully investigate this case to determine how and why ‘organic’ pet foods can allegedly contain Pentobarbital, and why such costly organic pet foods can also be produced and sold with allegedly misleading labels about healthy ingredients that are not actually contained in the food. We hope that this case can provide some assistance to people whose pets were injured or killed, and for consumers who may have been misled about the contents of this food. We intend to conduct a complete investigation by tracking the entire supply and distribution chain so that all responsible parties may be identified. We will follow the facts wherever they lead.”

Excerpts from the lawsuit…

On March 8, 2017 Ms. Black was then contacted by an unidentified male caller. He later identified himself as Bret Sher, and claimed he was a customer service representative of Party Animal. However it appears that he misrepresented that fact and that he is in fact affiliated with, or owner or operator of Defendant, Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Company, Inc., who is the supplier/manufacturer for the Party Animal pet foods in question.

At all times relevant, Bret Sher insisted that Party Animal’s Cocolicious was Organic and had to go through strenuous protocols to be labeled Organic and that even though the food was made in a plant that had a prior recall, that there was no possible way the Party Animal food could be affected because it is packed by hand and the recalled food was not. Mr. Sher vehemently denied that the Party Animal pet food made by his company, Evanger’s was tainted.

Nonetheless, Mr. Sher requested that Ms. Black put all Party Animal food in her possession outside of her home and stated that FedEx would come pick it up and that he would replace the food with a different food at no cost. Ms. Black had nine cans of unopened Party Animal Chicken/Beef from lot # 0134E1523713 and ½ can of Beef and Turkey from lot # 0136E1520404 (best by July 2019) which was secured in Ms. Black’s freezer.

FedEx picked up the first box and then Ms. Black found an additional can and let Bret Sher know. Sher sent FedEx again to retrieve the pet food.

Plaintiff insisted that the subject pet food be tested for contaminants or toxic agents, but neither Party Animal nor Evanger’s would confirm that testing would or had been conducted or provide Plaintiff any further information. They were, however, very anxious to relieve Ms. Black of the food samples.

Fortunately, Ms. Black, not not allow Defendants to take away all the tainted pet food, and thereafter sought professional laboratory testing of the food. After considerable efforts, a qualified laboratory from Texas A&M University tested an unopened can of the suspect Party Animal food. The tested food contained the euthanasia drug, Pentobarbital.

Having confirmed that Party Animal’s “organic food” actually contained a drug that is specifically used to kill animals, Ms. Black set about to determine if the pet food she purchased contained any of the other promised healthy and fresh ingredients. Further testing showed that Party Animal “Cocolicious” dog foods did not contain coconut or coconut compounds as advertised. In summary, it appears that Party Animal and Evanger are preying on unsuspecting animal lovers by falsely advertising its food as organic, wholesome, fresh and as containing other healthy and natural ingredients, when in fact, the only thing different about the food is the label and its marketing scheme.

For consumers or retailers that wish to join the lawsuit – contact information for the law firm is:

Jane M. Braugh or Roger S. Braugh, Jr.
SICO HOELSCHER HARRIS & BRAUGH LLP
225 S. Lake Avenue, Suite 300
Pasadena, CA 91101
Toll Free Phone: (888) 354-9791

To read the full complaint, Click Here.

 

Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,

Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food

What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients?  Chinese imports? Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 4,000 cat foods, dog foods, and pet treats. 30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. Click Here to preview Petsumer Report. www.PetsumerReport.com

list-seal-xsmall

 

The 2017 List
Susan’s List of trusted pet foods.  Click Here

 

Have you read Buyer Beware?  Click Here

Cooking pet food made easy, Dinner PAWsible

Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here

 

12 Comments

12 Comments

  1. Sally Roberts

    June 28, 2017 at 12:14 pm

    Sorry low life LYING greedy, cannot even think of enough words for a business that wants us to trust them ! Hope they go to jail and shut them down too

  2. Jane

    June 28, 2017 at 12:33 pm

    Do you know what ingredients they did find in the food? It’s really oily (and apparently delicious!), so if it isn’t coconut oil, I’d love to know what it is!

  3. Underrated Movies

    June 28, 2017 at 12:45 pm

    Nice work, Susan. Apparently that pretty little “USDA Organic” label means absolutely nothing. Lesson learned. Regards…

    • Peter

      June 28, 2017 at 3:34 pm

      “Organic” really does mean nearly nothing, owing to lack of enforcement. True organic production very intensive, and the products (in this example, meat) are/would be terribly expensive. But there is no consequence to using the term inappropriately.

      • Peter

        June 28, 2017 at 3:40 pm

        Consumers really do need to have access to information about ALL of the foods that the Shers/Evanger’s are involved with. It is a legitimate safety concern.

  4. Pacific Sun

    June 28, 2017 at 12:57 pm

    Where the “rubber meets the road” is when Evanger’s (which no doubt has a Swiss Bank Account for such emergencies) offers a million dollar settlement out of court. With a $5 coupon promised to every wronged consumer. And for all records to be sealed! Whereas I believe “Nikki” truly wants reformation in the industry, we shall see what happens in this otherwise air-tight case.

    What’s so fascinating is to watch morons (like the Shers) openly impersonating another entity (in the face of one lawsuit) and yet living to see another day of successful business operation. How many IPS stores have even pulled their product.

  5. Ian

    June 28, 2017 at 2:55 pm

    OMG!!! Sorry that this happened via injury to pets…. but what an eye-opener for the industry at large. I’m sure a lot of pet food executives and manufacturers are cleaning up their act as we speak. I am also quite shocked at the bald-faced way that Sher sought to get all the pet food in question back ASAP “Mr. Sher requested that Ms. Black put all Party Animal food in her possession outside of her home and stated that FedEx would come pick it up and that he would replace the food with a different food at no cost. ” GOOD FOR HER THAT SHE DIDN’T GIVE IT ALL BACK!!! THANK YOU !!! I wonder how many other customers just trustingly gave it all back without independent testing? Susan, Ms Black deserves some kind of TAPF award as a fellow crusader !

    • tallen

      June 28, 2017 at 3:32 pm

      I wholeheartedly agree!

    • Pacific Sun

      June 28, 2017 at 4:24 pm

      Between returning nearly a case of PF (assuming it would be testing, to having the food tested herself …. I wonder how the idea of a lawsuit developed? You would think, the original lawsuit against Evangers, and now including Party Animal, would be combined, for greater impact. And with PA testing for Pentobarbital too, then how sick did HER pets get? Was that the trigger for action, or in reading about Evanger’s in the first place? Yes, I can see where the claim of “organic” is an additional plot twist, but still, the claim falls back to Evanger’s failure to perform, their misrepresentation, and lack of responsibility. So will this case, also be dependent now, upon how the case against the supplier/renderer turns ou? From what we’ve read on TAPF, Regulators are supposed to be very strict about actual labeling on a can or bag. As I said in the above post, …. we shall see.

      • Dianne & Pets

        June 29, 2017 at 3:40 pm

        Perhaps if she joined with the other suit, she would be stuck if they decided to settle out of court and sign non-disclosure agreements. Maybe she is staying on her own because she won’t settle and she can only do that if she can’t be out voted by the other plaintiffs. Even if she tested because of the other suit, she was sold food that is adulterated and was mislabelled. Good for her.

  6. Marilyn C. Klein

    June 28, 2017 at 3:07 pm

    Does anyone know if any Party Animal cat food was involved in this ?

  7. Marsha

    June 28, 2017 at 4:06 pm

    So glad that she kept some of the food! Now lets see what they do! I would never give back food that a pet company wants. Let them squirm.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Learn More

Human Grade & Feed Grade
Do you know what the differences are between Feed Grade and Human Grade pet food? Click Here.

 

The Regulations
Pet Food is regulated by federal and state authorities. Unfortunately, authorities ignore many safety laws. Click Here to learn more about the failures of the U.S. pet food regulatory system.

 

The Many Styles of Pet Food
An overview of the categories, styles, legal requirements and recall data of commercial pet food in the U.S. Click Here.

 

The Ingredients
Did you know that all pet food ingredients have a separate definition than the same ingredient in human food? Click Here.

Click Here for definitions of animal protein ingredients.

Click Here to calculate carbohydrate percentage in your pet’s food.

 

Sick Pet Caused by a Pet Food?

If your pet has become sick or has died you believe is linked to a pet food, it is important to report the issue to FDA and your State Department of Agriculture.

Save all pet food – do not return it for a refund.

If your pet required veterinary care, ask your veterinarian to report to FDA.

Click Here for FDA and State contacts.

The List

The Treat List

Special Pages to Visit

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Click Here

Pet Food Recall History (2007 to present)
Click Here

Find Healthy Pet Foods Stores
Click Here

About TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

Friends of TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

You May Also Like

Pet Food News

TruthaboutPetFood.com received a letter from Evanger's Pet Food attorneys; claiming TAPF's post was "defamation" and "is damaging to Evanger's reputation". Post removed - because...

Pet Food Ingredients

It was more than inedible, the meat supplier Evanger's Pet Food purchased from was a dead animal carcass processor. A company that removes dead...

Pet Food News

Evanger's Pet Food company files a $20 million lawsuit against its meat supplier, but in the court documents the pet food company discloses they...

Pet Food News

The FDA just provided TruthaboutPetFood.com the following statement on their ongoing investigation into Evangers Pet Food. Some very telling information from FDA...