Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Pet Food News

Nutro Pet Food held accountable for Marketing Claim

In 2007, Nutro Pet Food stated probiotics were included in their pet foods. In 2013 a lawsuit was filed challenging the validity of the probiotic claim in Nutro Pet Foods. In 2015, Nutro Pet Food is admitting no wrong doing, but have entered into a ‘Settlement Agreement’ with those that challenged their marketing claim.

In 2007, Nutro Pet Food stated probiotics were included in their pet foods. In 2013 a lawsuit was filed challenging the validity of the probiotic claim in Nutro Pet Foods. In 2015, Nutro Pet Food is admitting no wrong doing, but have entered into a ‘Settlement Agreement’ with those that challenged their marketing claim.

The lawsuit settlement document states “The lawsuit alleges that Defendants violated the law by labeling and selling Nutro’s Ultra™ brand dry dog kibble (between April 1, 2007 and June 30, 2009) and/or Ultra™ brand dog biscuits (between April 1, 2007 and April 30, 2011) with a “Guaranteed Analysis” regarding the amount of Bacillus Species contained therein. Plaintiff believes he has viable claims, both individually and on behalf of a nationwide class of consumers (excluding California consumers), against Defendants and Defendants believe they have valid defenses.”

In other words – the lawsuit claimed that between April 1, 2007 through June 30, 2009 Nutro Ultra dog foods included probiotics in the Guaranteed Analysis and the plaintiff found that the probiotics were not live or viable and thus of no health benefit to the pet consuming the food. Including a probiotic or any other ingredient or supplement in the pet food Guaranteed Analysis is the manufacturer ‘guaranteeing’ that nutrient or supplement is included in the pet food.

The Wayback Machine website provided examples of the Nutro Ultra’s probiotic claim. From 2007…

NutroUltra2007

The Nutro Ultra website in 2007 stated: “Direct Fed Microbials. A source of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtillis that promote beneficial bacteria in a dog’s digestive tract.”

And the Wayback Machine did provide the Guaranteed Analysis statement from 2007 of Nutro Ultra Adult Dog Food; “Total Bacillus Species (min) 283 Million CFU/lb.”

NutroUltraGA2007

So…the plaintiff in this lawsuit must have provided sufficient evidence to prove that the ‘direct fed microbials’ Nutro Ultra guaranteed on the pet food label were not actually in the pet food or were not viable. Mars Nutro Ultra agreed to a settlement, but the company does not consider the settlement “any liability, fault, or wrongdoing of any kind”.

The settlement for consumer class members is “a $2.00 chicken or a $5.00 Gift Certificate towards the purchase of Nutro dog food products (Class Members can also elect to donate their claim to charity). Nutro also has agreed to pay court-approved attorneys’ fees and expenses (in an amount not to exceed $375,000.00).”

Is $2.00 a fair reimbursement to consumers that believed the probiotic marketing claim of the pet food? No – certainly it is not. However, the settlement cost the pet food company a hefty sum for attorney fees ($375,000.00 plus their own attorney fees). We have to hope that lawsuits and settlements like this cost pet food companies enough to make then rethink their marketing claims. We have to hope.

If you purchased a Nutro Ultra dog food between April 1, 2007 and June 30, 2009 you can participate in the settlement by visiting this website: http://www.ultradogfoodsettlement.com/index

 

Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,

Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food

What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients?  Chinese imports?  Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 3000 cat foods, dog foods,  and pet treats.  30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. www.PetsumerReport.com


seal_175x154
The 2015 List

Susan’s List of trusted pet foods.  Click Here

 

Have you read Buyer Beware?  Click Here

Cooking for pets made easy, Dinner PAWsible

Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here

4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Marsha

    September 10, 2015 at 6:01 pm

    Maybe this will help with other dog food companies. Time to be honest on your dog food bags! Or we will come and get you.

  2. Beth

    September 11, 2015 at 5:52 am

    I am by no means sticking up for the pet food companies because they are big business and basically all of them are globally sourcing their products – but I also think a lot of these claims/lawsuits are driven by consumers hoping to get a fast buck. This would have to be a dry probiotic – how could it be a live probiotic – as far as I know that would only be in a yogurt – etc.

    I have also feed Blue Buffalo for years and have nothing but healthy pets – love the product, the company., the fact that they cold form a vitamin kibble and the price is a great value for what you get. Feel the same way about all those who have joined the class action suit against them. Just suing in this litigious society is wrong and proves nothing.

    I think people also need to be wary of reports like this – The FDA is the official site for a recall, etc. – and I can remember a post awhile back on here about Blue being bought out by Mars – that has not happened as far as I know……….

  3. Pacific Sun

    September 11, 2015 at 3:45 pm

    True this case involves Nutro not BB. But BB is hardly in a better place to be defended. They’re the folks who claimed no by-products then blamed the supplier instead of taking responsibility for testing ingredients before inclusion. It took a lawsuit to uncover their “oversight.” Probiotics can be in a PF just as long as the consumer doesn’t expect them to be of “particular value.” The Nutro lawsuit is about claiming just that. PF can not “CLAIM” much more than being formulated under AAFCO guidelines, and they do so by confirming a ratio of minimum percentages of required protein, fat, moisture & carbohydrates. What companies do in addition (to be competitive) is “imply” other benefits through images, descriptive language (i.e., tarter control) and human food (like) analogies! The Nutro settlement wasn’t an admission of (intentional) wrong doing, but they had to (or agreed to) pay court costs, and a minimum payback (coupon) to affected customers! For what was at stake I doubt the litigants would have gone to all the time, trouble and risk of expense to prove a minor point, except for the principle of misleading intention. It was the idea that another PF company has to be reigned in when it comes to promoting exceptional PF. Good for the Class Action suitors, and hopefully encourages other consumer watchdogs! That’s the real point. Frivolous litigation is probably the least apparent in the PFI because it’s such an uphill battle.

    A Follower (with a Sheba Innu) on another thread has a new puppy looking for diet recommendations because of so much confusion. Sadly there are no (or few) responses. Because it’s tough, you can’t just rattle off a long list of brands that you’d be comfortable with every single day. It comes to choosing the lesser of so many evils. For convenience and economy kibble has to be choice many times. Okay but for optimal health then augment with whole, fresh foods, and/or rotated with raw. Owners should use different brands and formulas (recipes) not only so a pet will learn to eat variety, but to get a wide range of ingredients/nutrients. Too many pets are relegated to a single diet of the same brand/meal over and over again. That’s where problems begin. Pets can appear to be healthy (good at masking symptoms) but concerns arise during the aging process when they’re less able to self-correct. In the end, the fear is what will contribute (unnecessarily) to the premature demise of a pet. Human grade, dependable processing, plus a variety of whole food just helps tip the odds in their favor (long term).

  4. Peter

    September 13, 2015 at 8:15 am

    I would suggest that the $375K spent on attorney’s fees is regarded by the parent company merely as an ordinary cost of business.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Learn More

Human Grade & Feed Grade
Do you know what the differences are between Feed Grade and Human Grade pet food? Click Here.

 

The Regulations
Pet Food is regulated by federal and state authorities. Unfortunately, authorities ignore many safety laws. Click Here to learn more about the failures of the U.S. pet food regulatory system.

 

The Many Styles of Pet Food
An overview of the categories, styles, legal requirements and recall data of commercial pet food in the U.S. Click Here.

 

The Ingredients
Did you know that all pet food ingredients have a separate definition than the same ingredient in human food? Click Here.

Click Here for definitions of animal protein ingredients.

Click Here to calculate carbohydrate percentage in your pet’s food.

 

Sick Pet Caused by a Pet Food?

If your pet has become sick or has died you believe is linked to a pet food, it is important to report the issue to FDA and your State Department of Agriculture.

Save all pet food – do not return it for a refund.

If your pet required veterinary care, ask your veterinarian to report to FDA.

Click Here for FDA and State contacts.

The List

The Treat List

Special Pages to Visit

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Click Here

Pet Food Recall History (2007 to present)
Click Here

Find Healthy Pet Foods Stores
Click Here

About TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

Friends of TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

You May Also Like

Pet Food News

We asked Nutro Pet Food three questions, they ignored us.