Journalist Emmet Fraizer of the publication The Nation doesn’t like raw pet food…at all. In a recent post, the author bashes raw pet food from multiple different angles.
“You may not think raw food for cats and dogs could be harmful, but new cases suggest these brands and their evangelists could be putting your pets at risk.”
“…raw pet food—and the conspiracy-fueled wellness universe that drives it…”
Linked to raw pet food he states:
“In December of 2024, at least five cats in Oregon and Los Angeles died of bird flu…”
“In Colorado, 11 cats came down with the flu after being exposed to raw poultry or pet food…”
Based on data provided by the USDA, from May 2022 through April 22, 2025 there have been 136 cases of domestic cats diagnosed with avian flu. While Mr. Frazier attempts to link most of these cases to raw pet food, Freedom of Information Act documents tell a different story.
TruthaboutPetFood.com filed public records requests with each state the USDA has reported a case of avian flu in a domestic cat. In the greatest majority of cases, the records we received indicated that cats were exposed to avian flu from farm life; exposure to infected wild birds, infected dairy cattle. Yes, some of the sick cats were exposed to infected raw pet food (all of the pet foods involved sourced USDA inspected and passed meats). But in one State, it appeared cats (raccoons and skunks) died from avian flu linked to a dry (kibble) cat food.
Received from our public records request from Texas, quoting an email dated 3/25/25 from and to various state representatives of Texas Department of Agriculture and Texas Department of Health:
“A visit was made to the Hereford property on Saturday 3/15/2025 to further investigate the situation regarding the four positive HPAI cats.
There was a flock of grackles present. As per the owners, the grackles come and go.
Three peacocks and a rooster were present and appeared fine.
The beef cattle were moved from the area (near the barn) to different area when the skunks began to die.
The owners appreciated raccoons dying +/- 1 month ago, followed by the four skunks, then the cats en mass.
These animals have been seen eating from the communal bag of cat food.
…with no dead birds being found on the farm.”
These records from Texas seem to indicate that this particular outbreak of avian flu was linked to that “communal bag of cat food.” The records indicated that these cats died from avian flu NOT linked to raw pet food and NOT linked to infected wild birds, the records indicate these cats (raccoons and skunks) died from avian flu infected dry cat food.
And then journalist Emmet Fraizer of The Nation travels down the raw pet food pathogenic bacteria risk path. Sharing “Given the risks, it’s not surprising that the FDA, CDC, and American Veterinary Medical Association all discourage feeding pets a raw diet.”
But…when you look at the data from FDA Enforcement Reports…
Since January 1, 2012 – 2,019,350 pounds of raw pet food has been recalled for pathogenic bacteria.
Since January 1, 2012 – 158,079,008 pounds of kibble pet food has been recalled for pathogenic bacteria.
FDA statistics confirm, significantly more dry pet food has been found contaminated with pathogenic bacteria than raw pet food.
In fact, the FDA issued CPG Sec. 690.700 Salmonella Contamination of Dry Dog Food (now withdrawn) that stated:
“In a case involving salmonellosis diagnosed in a mother, daughter and the family dog, the Milwaukee Health Department traced the cause to a dry dog food, and a recall resulted. Following the recall, *CVM* initiated an abbreviated inspection and analytical survey of a representative number of manufacturers of finished dry dog food products to explore an industry claim that it is an impossibility to manufacture this type of product without Salmonella contamination.“
This particular journalist mistakenly tried to single out raw pet food as the only pet food risk on the market. The truth is…there are risks associated with all styles of pet food.
Opinion: While I do agree with this journalist in their perspective that staff cuts at FDA could result in greater risks of adulterants/contamination in pet food – I disagree that raw pet food is the ONLY style of pet food that might cut corners with little FDA oversight.
It is beyond disappointing when anyone singles out one style of pet food as the highest risk, while ignoring the facts of all styles of pet food. As well, it is downright insulting when a journalist calls educated pet owners conspiracy theorists.
Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food
Become a member of our pet food consumer Association. Association for Truth in Pet Food is a a stakeholder organization representing the voice of pet food consumers at AAFCO and with FDA. Your membership helps representatives attend meetings and voice consumer concerns with regulatory authorities. Click Here to learn more.
What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients? Chinese imports? Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 5,000 cat foods, dog foods, and pet treats. 30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. Click Here to preview Petsumer Report. www.PetsumerReport.com
Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here
The 2025 List
Susan’s List of trusted pet foods. Click Here to learn more.
The 2024/25 Treat List
Susan’s List of trusted pet treat manufacturers. Click Here to learn more.
Susn
April 25, 2025 at 1:39 pm
Those of us that feed raw and very picky as to what the animals are eating. Even their treats are not from a garbage company. I wish people would pay attention to what is in kibble. I have been raw feeding my dogs for 20 years and not one problem. My dogs live longer and DO NOT GO TO THE VET for illness. I also believe that raw feeders look for alternatives to shoving a pill done the throat when there are hundreds of homeopathic remedies. I think the problem is too much time to think and too much garbage posted by non educated people that they just take the lazy route. My dogs are very healthy and I would never change. Although I buy my main food for a co-op made by a butcher, it is scary when people start to raw feed with looking into it and just throw stuff in a bowl. It has to be balanced.
Marsha
April 25, 2025 at 1:39 pm
I’m sorry but I find that this man needs to really check out everything before he opens his mouth! I’m tired of people saying things that they have no knowledge of!
Marsha
April 25, 2025 at 1:40 pm
I’m tired of people saying things that they have no knowledge of!
Barbara Fellnermayr
April 25, 2025 at 3:04 pm
This “reporter” has intentionally misquoted the facts and probably eats highly processed food himself. He’s probably never had a real home-made meal!
It is impossible to produce pet food without salmonella when you use/store/process meat improperly.
I’d put my food up against any dry kibble on the market. I’d put my dog up against any kibble fed dog!
what a crock! Not worth the bytes it took to write it!
Peg
April 25, 2025 at 4:57 pm
My 22 year old cat has been eating conspiracy theory raw food since he was a year old. Last April, he was diagnosed with a brain tumor and is on raw food and Chinese herbs from a veterinary acupuncturist.
If the so called reporter can call me a conspiracy theorist, then I certainly can call the pinhead “fake news”
Sandy M.
April 25, 2025 at 6:05 pm
Being a professional journalist means engaging in the work of news gathering for compensation on behalf of a news organization. It involves fact-checking, and adhering to ethical standards and professional practices. Not so much with The Nation I guess.
This so called journalist works for a magazine who’s goal is to drive provocative debate and says “we value facts”. Not this time. It is shocking that this publication would pay someone to write the line “conspiracy-fueled wellness universe” about people caring for their pets. (Conspiracy is an agreement between two or more people to commit an illegal act, what?!) Sounds like propaganda to me. Gee I wonder who donates to them to get an article like this written. Disgusting.
Hubert
April 25, 2025 at 6:33 pm
This is hilarious! I can’t stop laughing at this drivel. Pure comedy in it’s low IQ keyboard diarrhea.
My thoughts:
Dear Emmet,
we have never met. Would you be so kind and point to your esteemed butt in this picture? https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/flock-sheep-walking-dusty-road-flock-sheep-walking-dusty-road-155492423.jpg
As a dyed-in-the-wool conspiracy nut, I am curious to see what a lobotomized sheep looks like once it can only follow the butt in front of his nose. I presume you are not the leader sheep. https://www.sheep101.info/flocking.html
However, you seem quite good at following simple instructions from those who pay you for your obedience. Does it help not to have the ability to think critically and to do honest research for an article?
Or is a steady paycheck sufficient? Were you poor thing born without a conscience?
Hang on to your job dear Emmet. Outing yourself as a propaganda shill while getting paid to be mocked and ridiculed must be quite the accomplishment.
Thanks for making me laugh!
Sincerely,
Raw-feeding conspiracy nut.
Peg
April 26, 2025 at 8:31 am
Brilliant✨
Dianne Miller
April 25, 2025 at 9:56 pm
Do you remember when the see see pee said that people who did not want buy their pet foods were supporting the independence of tee iii bee eee etetet. Gotta love conflating.
Kailan Hollywood
April 28, 2025 at 12:40 pm
In this day and age, I take being called a “conspiracy theorist” as a compliment 😉
Steve Mitchell
May 2, 2025 at 10:31 am
Susan, on one hand we always read how the FDA gets it wrong. Then, on the other hand, you worry about reducing the FDA staff. More staff doesn’t mean something operates better. Less government usually is a good thing. Especially since all the government organizations are bought by BIG PHARMA, BIG AG and BIG FOOD. We will be better off without their influence.
Susan Thixton
May 3, 2025 at 9:48 am
I disagree. You are right that more staff does not guarantee pet food safety, but on the other hand – less staff doesn’t guarantee pet food safety either. Less staff means fewer inspections, fewer investigations into reports of sick pets, even slower responses to FOIA requests (I waited 2+ years previously due to high number of requests and short staff). My concern is manufacturers already know they won’t be investigated/inspected…and they will cut corners.
Maggie
May 6, 2025 at 2:21 pm
Follow the money. Look at how publications like the Nation get their revenue. While some comes from subscribers, they’re still dependent on advertising. Big Kibble spends A LOT of money on advertising.