Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Pet Food News

FDA Response to No Beneful Recall

In response to a pet owner email, Dr. Bernadette Dunham of FDA stated many of the Beneful reports are “lacking key information that FDA would need to help determine appropriate follow up.” That key information Dr. Dunham speaks of, is veterinary records.

In response to a pet owner email, Dr. Bernadette Dunham of FDA stated many of the Beneful reports are “lacking key information that FDA would need to help determine appropriate follow up.” That key information Dr. Dunham speaks of, is veterinary records.

Our consumer association (ATPF) asked Dr. Dunham – director of the Center for Veterinary Medicine at FDA – questions regarding the Primal pet food recall based on one single consumer complaint and the lack of a Beneful recall with the agency receiving hundreds of Beneful consumer complaints. Dr. Dunham has not responded to us (nor has she ever responded to messages sent through our consumer association).

My FDA media contact (who is wonderful and always provides responses to questions) did provide me the following information. First, as to why Primal pet food was tested based on one consumer complaint…

“In the case of the Primal Pet Foods recall, the consumer complaint information provided to the FDA included comprehensive veterinary medical records indicating that the cat’s illness was the result of a thiamine deficiency. The complaint also had clear information indicating the cat had exposure to only the product affected by this recall.”

My original questions also asked if Beneful had been tested – but FDA did not respond to this initially. Follow up with FDA provided the following response…

“I asked and we have tested Beneful. That level of detail could be obtained in a FOIA.”

FOIA is a Freedom of Information Act request. In other words, if I wanted to know what Beneful was tested for and how often the food was tested during the past several years of FDA receiving hundreds of consumer complaints linked to this dog food – I would only be provided with this information through a Freedom of Information Act request. My request was sent March 18, 2015.

Though Dr. Dunham did not respond to our consumer association, she did respond to one of you great consumers out there who sent her similar questions. And what she told this consumer is…well, interesting.

This pet food consumer asked Dr. Dunham if Beneful had been tested by FDA based on the many complaints of this pet food. Dr. Dunham stated “By way of background, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C Act) requires that pet foods, like human foods, be safe to eat, produced under sanitary conditions, contain no harmful substances, and be truthfully labeled.  Pet food manufacturers, like other animal food manufacturers, are subject to inspection and enforcement of these regulations.”

Dr. Dunham also told this consumer…

“FDA has received complaints about Beneful dry kibble and is looking into them.  The complaints the Agency received related to Beneful have been primarily from pet owners, which we value very much, however, many of the reports are lacking key information that FDA would need to help determine appropriate follow up.  Where possible, it is extremely helpful to have both the veterinarian and the pet owner provide information to the FDA.”

I have several issues with Dr. Dunham’s response to this consumer, which were sent to Dr Dunham. My email to her…

Dr. Dunham,

This message is in response to your message to a pet food consumer (provided to me by the consumer). This consumer wrote you concerned about the many complaints with Beneful dog food. You stated in your response…

“By way of background, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C Act) requires that pet foods, like human foods, be safe to eat, produced under sanitary conditions, contain no harmful substances, and be truthfully labeled.  Pet food manufacturers, like other animal food manufacturers, are subject to inspection and enforcement of these regulations.”

As a pet food consumer advocate, I am concerned at this portion of your response to a consumer. With all due respect, I believe this to be a bit misleading to the consumer. Specifically, my concern is that FDA does not uniformly enforce The Act. As example: The Act’s definition of food. Subchapter II – Definitions states: “(f) The term “food” means (1) articles used for food or drink for man or other animals, (2) chewing gum, and (3) articles used for components of any such article.” http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2010-title21/html/USCODE-2010-title21-chap9-subchapII.htm

The Act’s definition of an adulterated food. Section 342 Adulterated food states: “A food shall be deemed to be adulterated – (a) Poisonous, insanitary, etc., ingredients (3) if it consists in whole or in part of any filthy, putrid, or decomposed substance, or if it is otherwise unfit for food; or (5) if it is, in whole or in part, the product of a diseased animal or of an animal which has died otherwise than by slaughter.” http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2010-title21/html/USCODE-2010-title21-chap9-subchapIV-sec342.htm

In direct conflict with The Act are FDA Compliance Policies. Such as CPG Sec. 690.300 Canned Pet Food which states: “Pet food consisting of material from diseased animals or animals which have died otherwise than by slaughter, which is in violation of 402(a)(5) will not ordinarily be actionable, if it is not otherwise in violation of the law. It will be considered fit for animal consumption.” This FDA Compliance Policy – along with many others – appears to be a direct violation of The Act. http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/CompliancePolicyGuidanceManual/ucm074710.htm

The Act requires much more than (quoting your message to this consumer) “pet foods, like human foods, be safe to eat, produced under sanitary conditions, contain no harmful substances, and be truthfully labeled.” The Act is quite specific as to animal food, however FDA’s enforcement of The Act is not (per FDA Compliance Policies). We are asking FDA for an explanation as to why the agency openly allows pet foods/animal feed to violate The Act.

You also stated to this pet food consumer “FDA has received complaints about Beneful dry kibble and is looking into them.  The complaints the Agency received related to Beneful have been primarily from pet owners, which we value very much, however, many of the reports are lacking key information that FDA would need to help determine appropriate follow up.  Where possible, it is extremely helpful to have both the veterinarian and the pet owner provide information to the FDA.”

Again, with all due respect to your position as Director of the Center for Veterinary Medicine, consumers would like to know what FDA has done to train veterinarians as to what information is needed by FDA in order for the agency to investigate adverse event reports? Has the FDA issued any instructional flyers directed to veterinarians or has the agency every worked with the AVMA or AHVMA to provide necessary instruction to practicing veterinarians?

It has been my experience that most veterinarians have no idea that they should report a suspect pet food adverse event or how to report; never the less what medical data is needed by FDA for an investigation. I personally have been asked by dozens of veterinarians on what to do when they treat a sick pet believed to be linked to a pet food – not one knew to report the issue or how.

I have written to you numerous times in the past on behalf of pet food consumers. Never once have you responded to me. Perhaps the reason why is that you believe I have an agenda – that I’m ‘out to get the FDA’. I want to assure you this is not correct. I do have an agenda – and it is a very simple agenda that I hope we can agree on. Safe pet food, accurately labeled pet food, legal pet food.

While I might be adamant about what pet food consumers deserve, I don’t bite. I have met with other representatives of FDA at AAFCO meetings and they left these meetings unscathed. I am asking you – as Director of the CVM – to allow me a voice for consumers with FDA. Your response to the pet owner quoted in this email is not completely accurate and I ask you to provide all pet food consumers with clarity (in your reference to The Act). I would also like to see FDA take an active role in educating practicing veterinarians on how to report a pet food related adverse event including what medical data is needed. I would like to be involved with FDA in developing such a project (for the sole purpose to assure that pet food consumers are adequately protected). And I am confident that should FDA develop proper educational material on how to report a pet food adverse event/what materials are needed by FDA – consumers will assist FDA in delivering these materials to their own veterinarians.

We – pet food consumers – honestly care about our pets and the safety of pet food. We’d like to work with FDA to achieve safe pet food, accurately labeled pet food, legal pet food. We are an organized stakeholder group that deserves the same voice that other pet food industry stakeholders are provided. We await your response.

Susan Thixton
Representing Pet Food Consumer Members of Association for Truth in Pet Food

I want to thank this pet food consumer who wrote Dr. Dunham and thank all of you that get involved to write FDA, your representatives in government, and spread the ‘truth’. We are making a difference! Here’s hoping that Dr. Dunham/FDA will begin to listen to the most important pet food industry stakeholder there is…consumers!

 

Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,

Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food

What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients?  Chinese imports?  Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 2500 cat foods, dog foods,  and pet treats.  30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. www.PetsumerReport.com


seal_175x154
The 2015 List

Susan’s List of trusted pet foods.  Click Here

 

Have you read Buyer Beware?  Click Here

Cooking for pets made easy, Dinner PAWsible

Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here

17 Comments

17 Comments

  1. Wolf

    March 25, 2015 at 1:54 pm

    You don’t bite? Well you should! I do. Come on up here and I’ll teach you.

    Seriously, this is more of same from the FDA. Inconsistency is about the only thing consistent about them. What kind of info, and the amount of info, really depends on to whom you speak, on what day, and if they’ve had enough coffee or not. It has seemingly little to do with a consistent rigorous policy executed without bias across the industry.

  2. frank romo

    March 25, 2015 at 2:04 pm

    Big industry has bought off the FDA and will never investigate any claims, just lip service to us pet owners…

  3. curious

    March 25, 2015 at 2:29 pm

    Susan, on an earlier post you told us that Beneful, Eukanuba, Iams, Royal Canine, and Banfield Vets were all owned by Mars. If that is the case, you need to determin how many Banfields treated possible sick pets where complainants isolated Beneful, and Banfield vets diverted beneful as the true cause to safeguard their own interests. Banfield vets ONLY recommend their own crappy brands of foods and scare customers away from all others.

    • Susan Thixton

      March 25, 2015 at 2:32 pm

      Beneful is owned by Purina – the others you mention are owned by Mars. And though it would be great if Banfield would provide public information about ill pets linked to a food, I doubt they would ever release this information. Good idea though!

  4. Sharon F

    March 25, 2015 at 2:36 pm

    Susan, I am in awe of you! Thanks as always for your diligence and perseverance! Your letters to the FDA etc. are extremely well researched, well written and thought-provoking. In a sense, you lift the burden of ‘expressing ourselves’ off our shoulders. I live in Ontario, Canada but follow your activities closely. Thanks again for going to battle for us and our 4-legged deeply loved companions.

  5. Trish Whitley

    March 25, 2015 at 4:42 pm

    You ROCK Susan…..

  6. Luke Schultz-Burrey

    March 25, 2015 at 6:18 pm

    Susan you rock, Thanks for your diligent work calling out the false information spread by the FDA! As a small independent shop trying to educate the consumer about the quality of some foods out there, we understand and appreciate your frustration and tenacity!!!

  7. Terri janson

    March 25, 2015 at 8:13 pm

    Can anyone suggest a good cat forum for cousin on homemade cat food? I have been telling her about our forum and about what is really going on. There were some people on here that are on
    cat forums. Can anyone help me put her in touch with them?

    Thank you Susan for all that you do!!!!!!!!!

    • Peg

      March 25, 2015 at 11:24 pm

      Terri Jansen, please tell your cousin about the Feline Nutrition Foundation.
      Those folks have some very helpful information about raw feeding.
      I get some great information and recipes from the that I use for my cats.
      Another thing about raw that I was thrilled to see is that Susan got a pledge from the Rad Cat people!
      I have been using their raw for over 2 years now and 2 of the 3 vets in the practice I go to are using Rad Cat Raw for their kitties.

      • Terri janson

        March 26, 2015 at 6:56 pm

        Thank you Peg. I will tell her

    • Bon

      March 29, 2015 at 12:55 pm

      Terri, I’ve been making raw cat food for about 5 years now (before the Feline Nutrition Foundation was formed). The 2 sites that helped me the most were (are) – Anne Jablonski’s http://www.catnutrition.org/
      and Dr. Lisa Pierson, DVM: http://www.catinfo.org/ – They link to each other and have similar recipes, along with a wealth of great info. Best of luck to your cousin.

      Susan, thanks for all you do for our fabulous furry friends.

  8. jb

    March 25, 2015 at 10:20 pm

    YOU! Are the WOMAN! Love you & all you do Susan. Thank you so much for your hard work keeping after these companies, FDA, AAFCO, etc.

    It takes dedication & a TONNE OF LOVE to do this work & as a follower I am amazed with the results you achieve.

    You do the Lover of All Animals a Superior Service!

    Though I raw feed, I depend on you for information.

    Keep up the INCREDIBLE Work. Hopefully I can get my Raw, Fermented business going & help you monetarily soon. You are definitely on my list of Giving Back!

  9. jb

    March 25, 2015 at 10:29 pm

    Thank you Susan for all your hard work. It is work from the heart.

    We depend on you for good information & your continuing pressure on these unethical companies.

    Personally, I do not care about most commercial pet food for my clan because iI feed raw but, so many people are oblivious to the dangers.

    I want my companions to live a long, quality life. That is why I feed raw & from sources I know but, many do not do this practice.

    Convenience is the game for most. They watch or see advertisements for food that claims Balanced, Complete, etc then factor in Vets that do not know nutrition from a rat’s ass.

    It is not fair to the companions to be fed nasty, 4d, roadkill, flea collars, metal tags, spoiled grains & oils, etc.

    WE are behind you, Susan. Thank you.

  10. Carla

    March 26, 2015 at 2:59 pm

    Great letter, Susan, very well informed (as always), and I especially like the part about “I am not out to ‘get’ the FDA, just be a voice for the consumers” (who don’t have the energy you have to ferret out all of this information). It shouldn’t be so difficult to get straight answers from the agencies supposedly there for the people who pay them (us).

  11. Anne

    March 29, 2015 at 8:23 am

    “Interesting”!

    • Peg

      March 29, 2015 at 10:41 am

      The FDA’s portal for reporting problems with pet food and pet medications has 2 separate reporting areas.
      One is for the pet owners.
      The other is for the veterinarians.
      Perhaps the 2 areas should be linked together.

      This is how it’s done with the adverse events reporting for the humans.

      But then again, I don’t have any real faith in the FDA like Anne does.

  12. TopCat

    April 2, 2015 at 7:52 pm

    Primal does not generously fund the Veterinary profession, nor provide profit-for-waste, so look for every small, independent decent food maker to be harassed and slandered now. Vets CAN’T report, i.e. “badmouth” Ralston or MARS and the other mass garbage bins because they’d be biting the hands that feed them; fund their educations, make possible all the new tech equipment… it’s downright dangerous to have pets now :>(

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Learn More

Human Grade & Feed Grade
Do you know what the differences are between Feed Grade and Human Grade pet food? Click Here.

 

The Regulations
Pet Food is regulated by federal and state authorities. Unfortunately, authorities ignore many safety laws. Click Here to learn more about the failures of the U.S. pet food regulatory system.

 

The Many Styles of Pet Food
An overview of the categories, styles, legal requirements and recall data of commercial pet food in the U.S. Click Here.

 

The Ingredients
Did you know that all pet food ingredients have a separate definition than the same ingredient in human food? Click Here.

Click Here for definitions of animal protein ingredients.

Click Here to calculate carbohydrate percentage in your pet’s food.

 

Sick Pet Caused by a Pet Food?

If your pet has become sick or has died you believe is linked to a pet food, it is important to report the issue to FDA and your State Department of Agriculture.

Save all pet food – do not return it for a refund.

If your pet required veterinary care, ask your veterinarian to report to FDA.

Click Here for FDA and State contacts.

The List

The Treat List

Special Pages to Visit

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Click Here

Pet Food Recall History (2007 to present)
Click Here

Find Healthy Pet Foods Stores
Click Here

About TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

Friends of TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

You May Also Like

Pet Food News

Speak now, before pet food is required to be irradiated.

Pet Food News

Lack of consistency in Salmonella Recall Alerts could Put Thousands in Danger

Pet Food Regulations

And refuses to do anything about.

Pet Food Regulations

USDA human food transparency and FDA pet food secrecy.