Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Pet Food News

Darwin’s Response to FDA Public Caution Statement

The other side of the story.

Below is the Darwin’s response to the FDA caution statement issued yesterday 3/26/19. This was received directly from Darwin’s Pet Food (and will be issued in a public press release).

Darwin’s Natural Pet Products Disputes FDA Warning
FDA offers no scientific rationale for zero-tolerance policy

SEATTLE March 27, 2019 – Today Darwin’s Natural Pet Products disputed an FDA warning regarding pathogens in its raw pet food. The FDA tested three lots of Darwin’s poultry meals, produced in October and November of last year, and claimed to find the presence of Salmonella in them. Darwin’s stated that the warning was inappropriate, as there is no inherent public health risk, and that customers were already aware of the situation as a result of the company’s own communications. Further, the FDA informed Darwin’s that it was issuing the warning because Darwin’s refused to turn over customers’ personal contact information which the FDA demanded to receive.

“We dispute both the recent FDA warning and as well as its policy.” said Gary Tashjian, Darwin’s Natural Pet Products president. “The public warning is inappropriate because we’ve already notified our customers directly via email about this situation on two occasions. More importantly, our customers have told us that this food was consumed by their pets long ago, with no medical issues reported. The facts show that there is no safety risk here.”

Darwin’s sells its meals directly to pet owners, and as a result of that direct relationship with its customers, the company keeps track of customer comments and complaints and can tell quickly if there are problems with its meals by looking for patterns in those calls. Since the product was produced and sent to customers almost four months ago, past experience, supported by customer feedback, indicates that all of this product had already been consumed without any evidence of problems.

Salmonella is inherent in raw poultry products and is unlikely to pose danger to most pets, or to humans when properly handled. Because of this, the USDA, which regulates meat and poultry for human consumption, allows for some presence of Salmonella in raw poultry. All of Darwin’s
ingredients, which are USDA-approved, meet these standards for human consumption. The FDA, however, which regulates pet food, maintains a zero-tolerance policy which disallows any presence of Salmonella, even in quantities too low to cause harm to either humans or pets.

“We find ourselves in the same situation as many other raw pet food companies have found themselves over the past year – having to decide whether to issue a recall for products that we believe are safe for pets, but which do not meet the standards set by the FDA,” said Tashjian. “We believe that the FDA has failed to demonstrate any scientific basis for establishing standards for pet food that are more stringent than the USDA sets for food intended for human consumption. Darwin’s believes that the FDA’s policy is misguided.”

In this instance, the FDA’s test records raised questions as to whether Salmonella was present in the food at all. Moreover, the FDA failed to provide Darwin’s with “split samples” (i.e., retained samples of the tested product) to enable the company to perform its own independent tests to confirm the FDA’s findings – even though the FDA is required by law to do so.

“For all of these reasons, we do not believe that the facts support a recall of these products, which is why we have refused to do so,” said Tashjian. “We also believe that the FDA’s demands for our customers’ personal information infringes on their right to privacy, and is inappropriate under the circumstances.”

Darwin’s encourages its customers and anyone who raw feeds their pet to contact the company for more details about how the company came to this decision. A special toll-free number has been set up for inquiries: 866-832-8319 (Monday-Friday from 6am to 6pm, and Saturday 7am-3pm Pacific Time).

End of Darwin’s statement.

Personal opinion: From personal experience, I can say with confidence this sentence from the Darwin’s response is absolutely true: “We believe that the FDA has failed to demonstrate any scientific basis for establishing standards for pet food that are more stringent than the USDA sets for food intended for human consumption.” I have personally seen email after email from multiple different parties that asked FDA for scientific basis of their zero tolerance for pathogenic bacteria in raw pet food (such as which strains of Salmonella cause pet illness? and how many bacteria of each strain of Salmonella that is known to cause illness does it take to actually cause illness?). The FDA has NEVER given anyone a response. I’ve also asked FDA for the scientific evidence of the safety of rendered sick and dead animals used in pet food (allowed by FDA in pet food with no warning to the pet owner). The FDA response: “We could not find the requested records.” How can the FDA properly regulate pet food if their internal rules are not based on sound scientific evidence? They can’t.

As to Darwin’s statement that FDA did not provide the company with split samples – this is the same complaint numerous other raw pet foods that were forced to recall has stated. Providing a split sample is a legal requirement of any regulatory body. Government agencies are required by law to provide the company a split sample of the product they tested. Ignoring this legal requirement with some styles of pet food is NOT the proper way to regulate.

We aren’t asking for special exceptions to be made for raw pet food. Instead we are asking for uniform enforcement of law (actual law, not FDA policies) – uniform enforcement of law across all styles of pet food. FDA’s internal policies that allow the pet feed industry to utilize illegal wastes from the processing of human food while at the same time holding raw pet food to standards above that of human food is NOT uniform enforcement of law.

Direct your emails to FDA at AskCVM@fda.hhs.gov

My thanks to Darwin’s Pet Food for their transparency in this issue with me and the public.



Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,

Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food

Become a member of our pet food consumer Association. Association for Truth in Pet Food is a a stakeholder organization representing the voice of pet food consumers at AAFCO and with FDA. Your membership helps representatives attend meetings and voice consumer concerns with regulatory authorities. Click Here to learn more.

What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients?  Chinese imports? Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 5,000 cat foods, dog foods, and pet treats. 30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. www.PetsumerReport.com

The 2019 List
Susan’s List of trusted pet foods. Click Here to learn more.

Cooking pet food made easy, Dinner PAWsible

Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here

9 Comments

9 Comments

  1. Marilyn Evans

    March 27, 2019 at 3:20 pm

    I have fed Darwin’s to my dogs for over 6 years. I find the company to be responsible and responsive to its customers. This is another example of the FDA’s pejorative stance toward the raw pet food industry.

  2. Judi Perrin

    March 27, 2019 at 3:22 pm

    Based on the FDA’s requirements for raw pet food, including chicken, we should all be eating it and forget the grocery store. What colossal idiocy. I understand the importance of food safety, but this is bureaucracy at its’ worst.

    • Susan Thixton

      March 27, 2019 at 3:24 pm

      Excellent point!

    • Janice

      March 27, 2019 at 6:00 pm

      Well said, Judi!

      • Jed

        June 11, 2019 at 3:52 pm

        Silly comment Judi. Do you not understand the difference between USDA inspected meats and raw pet food?

        USDA meats are intended to be cooked while raw pet food is a ready to eat product.

  3. Dorothy

    March 27, 2019 at 3:47 pm

    I have been feeding Darwin’s to my dog for 7.5 years now, with great results. My dog (10 yr old Cocker Spaniel mix) has never had an ear infection, skin problem, or any of the other myriad health issues associated with feeding raw kibble. I for one am thrilled that Darwin’s is pushing back on the FDA, and that they didn’t provide my personal contact info to them. I have no interest in hearing from one of their uninformed and misguided representatives.

  4. Judy

    March 28, 2019 at 3:39 am

    I really wondered about the statement that the salmonella contamination was dangerous to pets, Obviously raw food requires safe handling to prevent humans from becoming ill- that’s true whether the food is destined for a human’s plate or a dog bowl. But dogs eat carrion much more often than we’d like to think, and while there may be a bit of a tummy upset, the only real danger is to light colored carpet! Meanwhile Hill’s is poisoning scores of dogs and now cats are also coming to vet practices sick, with elevated levels of Vitamin D, as are dogs who have been fed Science Diet dry and all we hear are crickets from the FDA and excuses from Hill’s. It’s heartbreaking.

  5. Pam

    April 9, 2019 at 8:30 am

    You want some rich person to take legal action and check the bank accounts of your highest employees/directors of the FDA… someone is being paid a lot of money to do it this way… follow the money!

  6. Heather Stanton

    April 9, 2019 at 2:01 pm

    The entire thing was ridiculous!

    In 2018 FSIS tested chicken destined for grocery stores, 35% of chicken processed by 159 largest slaughter houses failed to meet FSIS standards of 15.4% contamination,that is over 45 companies.

    Darwin’s is taken to task for possibly having salmonella in dog food. Chickens are not bred on another planet and brought here to Darwin’s to produce pet food. Darwin’s uses the same whole chickens that we buy from the grocery store.
    Whatever contamination level that was found in Darwin’s was the same as if you bought chicken from the grocery store, and fed it to your children..

    Not to mention salmonella is very unlikely to harm a dog while humans are very much affected by it

    The Whole incident would have been laughable, EXCEPT for the harm done to Darwin’s business.
    That is NOT funny

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Learn More

Human Grade & Feed Grade
Do you know what the differences are between Feed Grade and Human Grade pet food? Click Here.

 

The Regulations
Pet Food is regulated by federal and state authorities. Unfortunately, authorities ignore many safety laws. Click Here to learn more about the failures of the U.S. pet food regulatory system.

 

The Many Styles of Pet Food
An overview of the categories, styles, legal requirements and recall data of commercial pet food in the U.S. Click Here.

 

The Ingredients
Did you know that all pet food ingredients have a separate definition than the same ingredient in human food? Click Here.

Click Here for definitions of animal protein ingredients.

Click Here to calculate carbohydrate percentage in your pet’s food.

 

Sick Pet Caused by a Pet Food?

If your pet has become sick or has died you believe is linked to a pet food, it is important to report the issue to FDA and your State Department of Agriculture.

Save all pet food – do not return it for a refund.

If your pet required veterinary care, ask your veterinarian to report to FDA.

Click Here for FDA and State contacts.

The List

The Treat List

Special Pages to Visit

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Click Here

Pet Food Recall History (2007 to present)
Click Here

Find Healthy Pet Foods Stores
Click Here

About TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

Friends of TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

You May Also Like