A new bill has been introduced into the U.S. Senate, S.4520 – Food Safety Administration Act of 2022. The bill proposes to remove the regulation of food – including pet food – from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) into a new government agency titled the Food Safety Administration.
This proposed new agency will be led by an appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate individual “who shall have food safety expertise”.
Is there hope for safer (law abiding) pet food with this bill?
Because this agency will be led by a ‘food safety expert’, we hope this individual will have an understanding that diseased animals and animals that have died other than by slaughter – allowed by existing FDA – are a certain risk to pets and people.
Another hope with the proposed agency is the establishment of “Advisory Committees”. The bill states “The Administrator shall establish advisory committees that consist of representative of scientific expert bodies, academics, industry specialists, and consumers.” Including consumers/consumer representatives is something the existing Center for Veterinary Medicine refuses to do.
And the new bill would require high risk food facilities (including pet food facilities) to be inspected at least once a year, low risk facilities at least every three years. As well, the proposed bill would require “a follow-up compliance check” within 30 days at any manufacturing facility after a failed inspection (or recall).
In nothing to do with the proposed bill, yesterday – July 20, 2022 – the FDA was asked to appear before the Senate Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration and Related Agencies. Committee members questioned the agency on food safety.
While most of the 2+ hour meeting was about human food, Senator Moran of Kansas did ask FDA about passing new feed ingredients. He asked what steps has FDA taken to speed up the process to approve new feed ingredients. FDA Commissioner Califf stated Dr. Solomon (director of Center for Veterinary Medicine) who was not present would have to respond. Of concern, Senator Moran stated to FDA that ‘the livestock industry is looking to offer solutions to meet the challenges as related to climate – ingredients that could reduce green house gas omissions.’ Senator Moran stated these products that animals would consume to reportedly reduce green house gases are currently regulated as animal drugs. Senator Moran asked if these ‘climate solutions’ could be approved as a feed ingredient instead of a drug. FDA Commissioner agreed to look into this. Based on his questions to FDA, it was clear Senator Moran was/is heavily influenced by the feed industry.
[Personal Opinion: an ingredient added to the diet of factory farmed animals that reportedly reduces green house gases is not something I have researched, but it seems on the surface to be VERY concerning. And for the animal feed industry to push – through Senator Moran – to make these substances a feed ingredient (instead of a drug) is an added concern. Being a feed ingredient would mean industry doesn’t have to prove much on safety before the product would pass and be used in feed. One concern – after consumption, do these substances collect into internal organs of livestock, that would ultimately be fed to pets. Will anyone look into this potential pet food safety concern before they become feed ingredients?]
Instead of defending industry interests, Senator Tester of Montana asked FDA some pertinent questions directly relating to human (and in turn pet) health regarding the nutritional value of food – how it has changed. Senator Tester reminded FDA of the Hippoccrates quote ‘Let food be thy medicine’. He asked why isn’t FDA doing research on what industry has done to food such as GMOs. “Is anybody doing any research to see that if the food they are eating is actually making them healthier?” FDA skirted the question ultimately saying that USDA is the agency in charge of this research not FDA. Senator Tester pushed FDA further on this issue, and the FDA finally responded stating they do not have the financial resources.
For those that would like to view a recording of this meeting, Click Here.
We encourage pet owners to let their representatives in Congress know how you feel about a potential new Food Safety Administration as proposed in S.4520 – Food Safety Administration Act of 2022. As well, we encourage pet owners to let their representatives know how you feel about the existing FDA’s regulation of pet food. To find your representatives in Congress, visit: https://www.congress.gov/members/find-your-member.
Wishing you and your pet the best –
Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food
Become a member of our pet food consumer Association. Association for Truth in Pet Food is a a stakeholder organization representing the voice of pet food consumers at AAFCO and with FDA. Your membership helps representatives attend meetings and voice consumer concerns with regulatory authorities. Click Here to learn more.
What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients? Chinese imports? Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 5,000 cat foods, dog foods, and pet treats. 30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. Click Here to preview Petsumer Report. www.PetsumerReport.com
Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here
The 2022 List
Susan’s List of trusted pet foods. Click Here to learn more.
Sally
July 21, 2022 at 1:38 pm
Seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis or Ascophyllum nodosum) is the ingredient proposed to be added to cattle feed in order to reduce methane emissions by 70-80%. It is not a drug, but it may be considered a supplement. Hawaii and Sweden are two places ramping up production of feed appropriate seaweed in anticipation of worldwide industry acceptance.
Susan Thixton
July 21, 2022 at 1:43 pm
What is “feed appropriate seaweed”?
Sally
July 21, 2022 at 1:53 pm
The seaweed/kelp that reduces methane emissions in cattle is what the term means. I am no advocate of this, and I don’t support the cattle industry by eating or using their products.
Susan Thixton
July 21, 2022 at 1:58 pm
Thanks Sally!
T Allen
July 21, 2022 at 6:52 pm
Seaweed known to be edible and non toxic to cattle. Research on this has been going on for decades and seaweed has been fed in Norway for years. Wild sheep, cattle and ponies in the British Isles have eaten seaweeds for millenia. They can excrete the salt better than their non coastal relatives. I haven’t heard of any any other “drugs” or feeds that reduce methane in cattle.
Toni
July 21, 2022 at 1:42 pm
We can dream it, I guess.
Stephen Michonski
July 21, 2022 at 2:13 pm
A presidential appointee will likely be an “expert” fully controlled by the mega-corporations who dictate food policy and regulation through their lobbying. These are the same people who claim glyphosate, seed oils and red dye #5 are safe ingredients. Want safe dog food? Don’t look to the government. Want safe anything? Don’t listen to the government. The agencies are all bought and paid for. Go local.
T Allen
July 21, 2022 at 6:57 pm
Unfortunately likely true! It depends on the President and his/her advisors but so far their choice of experts leaves a lot to be desired. Feeding seaweed to cattle to cut methane emissions is great as long as they don’t destroy the environment doing it! Farming seaweed off shore would have a lot of benefits.
Andy
July 21, 2022 at 8:53 pm
“Farming seaweed off shore would have a lot of benefits.” Who does it benefit?
As a native San Diegan and climate activist, I don’t want to see our oceans raped and pillaged by farmers looking for something else to feed cattle.
Will the fuel used for harvesting and subsequent transporting of seaweed 100’s to 1000’s of miles to farmers, offset the methane produce by cattle?
Will there be inland aquatic farms raising seaweed? What additives/chemicals will be used to grow a ‘better’ seaweed?
Cattle don’t eat corn, and they sure as heck don’t eat seaweed as a regular part of a natural diet.
Stephen Michonski
July 24, 2022 at 10:28 pm
There is a British company called Bennamann that harnesses methane emissions and converts to fuel. That is a better answer, not punishing cows for farting and running the world on electricity. Creative solutions solve problems, not government agencies.
T Allen
July 21, 2022 at 7:02 pm
S.4520 sounds like a good start to get FDA out of the food safety business! AFFCO must be scrambling! Time to write emails!
Stephen Abarno
July 22, 2022 at 3:43 pm
Anything the government does is a cluster fk !! And to believe this change is for the better you have to be delusional !!! Do your research and you can see,but most people are to lazy………….
Crystal A Hill
July 24, 2022 at 4:09 pm
HI TRUTH LISTENERS,As a Jesus Christ God Follower. I believe we Need wisdom and discernment. CHOICE IS WHAT GOD GIVES US. I CHOOSE GOD BECAUSE HE KNOWS BEST FOR HIS CHILDREN.Proverbs 2:7 says God gave us a treasure of common sense, to those who walk with with integrity. We know that govt agencies, big pharma, CDC, AMA,ADA,VACCINES,FDA,EPA, AND THEY DO HAVE ONE STANDARD,ITS MONEY! THAT’S IT! THEY KNOW Nothing ABOUT HEALTH. THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT CLEAN FOOD FOR HUMANS OR CREATURES. OUR ECO SYSTEM AND SOIL IS CRYING FOR HELP. THEY ADD HUMAN WASTE BIOSLUDGE TO OUR SOIL. SO I TELL PEOPLE GROW YOUR OWN FOOD AND SHARE SO WE CAN MAKE OUR OWN PETFOOD AND KEEP THEM SAFE. I KNOW THE INGREDIENTS IN MY PETFOOD. THANK YOU GOD FOR Susan THIXTON FOR SERVING US AND Teaching US TO TEACH OTHERS ABOUT TRUTH! XOXOXO IN HIS LOVE, CRYSTAL HILL.