Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Pet Food Regulations

We have requested FDA withdraw from AAFCO

Based on violations of federal discrimination laws, FDA is prohibited to provide AAFCO with federal funding. Therefore, we have officially requested the Agency immediately withdraw from AAFCO.

Based on violations of federal discrimination laws, FDA is prohibited to provide AAFCO with federal funding. Therefore, we have officially requested the Agency immediately withdraw from AAFCO.

Based on the recent actions of AAFCO banning pet owners from attending regulatory meetings, we have been in contact with multiple parties providing us with assistance. The following letter was sent to FDA (via email) today 11/21/2019:

To: Dr. Steven Solomon (director FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine), and Dr. Dave Edwards (FDA AAFCO liaison)

Dr. Solomon and Dr. Edwards,

On behalf of pet owner members of Association for Truth in Pet Food, we send this notice to FDA requesting the Agency immediately withdraw from participation in AAFCO and/or the Animal Feed Regulatory Program Standards. We also request MOU 225-07-7001 be immediately nullified.

Our request is based on serious and undeniable violations of federal law that prohibits discrimination by recipients of federal funds.

Background

MOU 225-07-7001 is an agreement between FDA and the Association of American Feed Control Officials. Per the FDA website:

AAFCO provides a process (herein called the AAFCO Ingredient Definition Request Process) to identify the safety, utility, and identity of ingredients used in animal feed. The AAFCO Ingredient Definition Request Process is operated by AAFCO, with the FDA providing scientific and technical assistance. The result of this collaboration has been the establishment of an effective program of benefit to feed regulatory officials, the industry, and the public.”

“The Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) is a voluntary membership organization of the states in the United States (US) and Federal government agencies, as well as government agencies from other countries, responsible for the execution of laws and regulations pertaining to the production, labeling, distribution, use, or sale of animal feed and feed ingredients. The purpose of AAFCO is to provide a mechanism for developing and implementing uniform and equitable laws, regulations, standards, definitions, and enforcement policies for the manufacturing, labeling, and sale of animal feeds and ingredients.  AAFCO provides “model laws” and regulations that nearly all states have adopted as the basis for their feed-control program. The FDA is a member of AAFCO and serves in a non-voting advisory role on the AAFCO Board.”

FDA liaison for MOU 225-07-7001 is:
David Edwards, Ph.D.
Supervisory Animal Scientist
Division of Animal Feeds, HFV-220
Center for Veterinary Medicine, FDA
7519 Standish Place
Rockville, MD 20855
Tel: (240) 402-6205
E-mail: david.edwards@fda.hhs.gov

AAFCO liaison for MOU 225-07-7001 is:
Susan Hays
AAFCO Executive Director
1800 S. Oak Street, Suite 100
Champaign, IL 61820
Tel: 217-356-4221
E-mail: aafco@aafco.org

Source: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/domestic-mous/mou-225-07-7001

The Animal Feed Regulatory Program Standards (AFRPS) is explained by FDA as:

In 2011, the FDA and the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) partnered to develop the Animal Feed Regulatory Program Standards (referred to as the feed standards). The feed standards establish a uniform foundation for the design and management of states’ programs responsible for the regulation of animal feed. Through implementing the feed standards, a state’s program will be better able to achieve and maintain programmatic improvements that help ensure the safety and integrity of the U.S. animal feed supply. A state’s implementation of the feed standards also helps to ensure a uniform and consistent approach to feed regulation among jurisdictions. The goal of the standards is to leverage resources and share common successes to build systems within state regulatory feed programs.”

Source: https://www.fda.gov/federal-state-local-tribal-and-territorial-officials/regulatory-program-standards/animal-feed-regulatory-program-standards-afrps

AAFCO members of AFRPS receive federal funding as explained in this document: https://www.fda.gov/media/129542/download

Violations of federal discrimination law

AAFCO liaison for MOU 225-07-7001 Susan Hays recently sent emails (on behalf of AAFCO) banning consumers and consumer advocates from attending AAFCO meetings. The following is the email from Ms. Hays on behalf of AAFCO – sent to a pet owner that had attended 3 AAFCO meetings:

From: AAFCO <aafco@aafco.org>
To: AAFCO <aafco@aafco.org>
Cc: AAFCO Executive Director <exec@aafco.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2019, 08:50:01 AM EST
Subject: AAFCO

As directed by legal counsel and the board of directors, your access to AAFCO resources is restricted until the resolution of the federal lawsuit, Lsytn LLC v. Food and Drug Administration, No. 19-cv-01943-PAB-KLM (D. Colo). Except for the print OP subscription being available to you, the AAFCO resources not accessible to you during this period include AAFCO meetings, the Feed BIN, AAFCO committees and work groups participation, and any other AAFCO resources not specifically identified here.

You are officially removed from any position as an AAFCO adviser, committee member, work group participant, claims of any representation of your interests or organization with AAFCO, involvement during AAFCO meetings, which are now unavailable to you, including by conference line, and any other claim of expert assistance to AAFCO.

Any reference to you and your company as an AAFCO adviser and your contact information are removed from the 2020 OP and future issues of the OP and the BIN until the lawsuit is resolved.

Please remove any claim that you are an AAFCO adviser from your email signature and from your website or social media sites. For the duration of the lawsuit, this is not accurate. At the resolution of the lawsuit, you may apply to AAFCO for consideration to be allowed to access AAFCO resources. We do not guarantee that you will be reinstated access to AAFCO resources.

Sue Hays CBC
AAFCO Executive Director
Email: exec@aafco.org

MOU 225-07-7001 AAFCO liaison Susan Hays sent the exact same email to ALL pet owners and ALL pet owner advocates that had previously attended AAFCO meetings – even though these individuals are in no manner affiliated with the lawsuit “Lsytn LLC v. Food and Drug Administration”.

AAFCO’s intentional and direct ban of pet owners and pet owner advocates from “AAFCO resourcesis in no uncertain terms discrimination.

Federal law prohibits discrimination by recipients of federal funds.

Therefore, FDA must immediately and publicly announce their withdrawal from AAFCO and AFRPS, and MOU 225-07-7001 must immediately be nullified.

We request the FDA to post a public notice regarding the Agency’s withdrawal from participation in any future AAFCO or AFRPS process and the nullification of MOU 225-07-7001 no later than end of business Monday November 25, 2019.

On behalf of pet owners,
Susan Thixton

Should FDA not comply with our request, we will have the assistance of the U.S. Department of Justice to take further action. We will continue to update pet owners as more is learned.


Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,

Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food

Become a member of our pet food consumer Association. Association for Truth in Pet Food is a stakeholder organization representing the voice of pet food consumers at AAFCO and with FDA. Your membership helps representatives attend meetings and voice consumer concerns with regulatory authorities. Click Here to learn more.

Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here

What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients? Chinese imports? Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 5,000 cat foods, dog foods, and pet treats. 30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. www.PetsumerReport.com

The 2019 List
Susan’s List of trusted pet foods. Click Here to learn more.

11 Comments

11 Comments

  1. Kelly

    November 21, 2019 at 12:46 pm

    Susan Thixton, you are my hero! You go girl!

  2. David

    November 21, 2019 at 12:52 pm

    Thank you for writing on behalf of all of us concerned pet parents. The likely reality is unless legal action is taken no changes will occur.

  3. Tina

    November 21, 2019 at 2:58 pm

    Hi Susan, Thank you for submitting the letter. I’m glad it was done. I think it is a clever move. I am concerned that the FDA will not recognize the pet owner ban as discrimination per se by the law because ‘pet owners’ is not a federally protected group — the groups that do receive protection are delineated, such as race, age, nationality, etc…

    • Reader

      November 21, 2019 at 3:15 pm

      What about gender?

      And it’s not just an “Association” that’s being excluded, but individuals by name. If that isn’t biased “discrimination” I can’t imagine what is.

      • Tina

        November 21, 2019 at 3:22 pm

        Gender is definitely a protected group, I agree. In this case of pet owners being banned, it is not clear that they are banned for a particular gender though. They are being banned on account of them being pet owners presumably…which is not a federally protected class of people. It is biased discrimination, in the general sense but not, I think possibly, in the legal sense.

        • Reader

          November 21, 2019 at 4:24 pm

          Well it’s not just being a pet owner. Because any pet owner “could” fall into a protected group, and then claim their right of access.

          Instead it’s just TAPF’s “Association” of members, which is being excluded. Because it’s assumed that the “interests” of TAPF (meaning pet food advocacy work) aligns in the best interests (aka support) of “Answers” PF. Which is involved in the pending lawsuit brought against the FDA. Am assuming that it could be said, whatever TAPF might be privy too in an AAFCO meeting, “might” be used to collude with whatever is in the best interest of “Answers'” litigating against the FDA.

          Don’t get me wrong. I am in no way suggesting there is ANY conflict of interest, nor would there be, because the author of this site is the most honest person I’ve ever met!

          • Tina

            November 21, 2019 at 5:33 pm

            I think any pet owner “could” fall into a protected group — literally any adult can –, & then claim their right of access, but that would not be a justifiable method of claiming access. Merely claiming one is discriminated against by AAFCO on the basis of gender, for example, does not make it so.

  4. Anne

    November 21, 2019 at 4:25 pm

    Thank you Susan, for all your hard work. Know how much you are appreciated!

  5. jnshok

    November 21, 2019 at 6:20 pm

    From their website: (AAFCO members)are charged by their local, state or federal laws to regulate the sale and distribution of animal feeds and animal drug remedies.

    I believe our government is supposed to act in the best interest of the citizens, including distributing tax payer dollars, so FDA an AAFCO tie in here somewhere as I discuss below.

    As for protected classes some people who have ‘pets” might fit into a federally protected class under the Americans With Disabilities Act. People who rely on animas for their own medical care, including service dogs and emotional support animals, rely on the health of their anima, and the animals are not actually pets. We’re not just talking about dogs and cats under AAFCO, correct? Thousands of dollars go into training and healthcare of the animals, so owners, trainers, and any others involved in raising and support should be able to receive and offer as much food/feed information as possible, including from AAFCO.

    Animals are also funded for government sponsored learning and social programs, which might receive federal or state funding, including therapy with children, adults, and seniors.

    • Tina

      November 21, 2019 at 7:06 pm

      That’s a great point

  6. Katherine Marin

    December 2, 2019 at 1:43 am

    AMAZING!!!! THANK YOU FOR DOING THIS!!!!!!!! AAFCO IS A JOKE!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Learn More

Human Grade & Feed Grade
Do you know what the differences are between Feed Grade and Human Grade pet food? Click Here.

 

The Regulations
Pet Food is regulated by federal and state authorities. Unfortunately, authorities ignore many safety laws. Click Here to learn more about the failures of the U.S. pet food regulatory system.

 

The Many Styles of Pet Food
An overview of the categories, styles, legal requirements and recall data of commercial pet food in the U.S. Click Here.

 

The Ingredients
Did you know that all pet food ingredients have a separate definition than the same ingredient in human food? Click Here.

Click Here for definitions of animal protein ingredients.

Click Here to calculate carbohydrate percentage in your pet’s food.

 

Sick Pet Caused by a Pet Food?

If your pet has become sick or has died you believe is linked to a pet food, it is important to report the issue to FDA and your State Department of Agriculture.

Save all pet food – do not return it for a refund.

If your pet required veterinary care, ask your veterinarian to report to FDA.

Click Here for FDA and State contacts.

The List

The Treat List

Special Pages to Visit

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Click Here

Pet Food Recall History (2007 to present)
Click Here

Find Healthy Pet Foods Stores
Click Here

About TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

Friends of TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

You May Also Like

Pet Food Regulations

This meeting will probably include some more than typical drama.

Pet Food Regulations

Secret changes are happening that could be dangerous for pet food and animal feed.

Pet Food Regulations

AAFCO crosses a concerning line by defending ingredients made from poultry feces.

Pet Food News

...you are being told incorrect information.