Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Pet Food News

The Pet Food Prescription Pad Has Been Challenged

A lawsuit against Hill’s Prescription Diet approved for a class action.

On September 29, 2023 a several years established lawsuit against Hill’s Prescription Pet Food was granted “Class Certification; the lawsuit becomes a class action allowing many more pet owners to join.

This lawsuit revolves around the ‘prescription’ illusion of Hill’s Prescription Diets. Quoting the ruling allowing the class:

At the heart of Plaintiffs claims is the undisputed fact that Defendant Hill’s restricts the sale of Prescription Diet (“PD”) pet food to those with a prescription from a veterinarian… Plaintiffs assert deceptive practices claims, which allege that PD is not legally required to be sold by prescription, and so Defendants’ representations that PD is required to be sold by prescription are literally false. Plaintiffs further allege that Defendants engaged in deception in the manufacturing, distributing, marketing, advertising, labeling, and/or selling of PD at above-market prices to diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent diseases or other conditions, even though PD: (a) does not contain a drug, medicine or other ingredient that is not also common in non-prescription pet food; (b) does not contain a substance medically necessary to the health of the pet for which it was prescribed; and/or (c) is not materially different than non-prescription pet food.”

Plaintiffs also assert unfair practices claims, alleging that Defendants manufactured, marketed, labeled, and/or sold PD at above-market prices to diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent diseases in animals without approval as a “new animal drug” pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301, et seq. (“FD&C Act”), and without being registered and listed as a “drug” with the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). (2d Am. Compl. ¶¶ 38-45.) As a result, PD is allegedly adulterated and misbranded under the FD&C Act and its introduction into interstate commerce is a prohibited act.”

The lawsuit claims are true. Hill’s and other brands of pet foods intended to cure, mitigate, treat or prevent diseases – currently sold ONLY through a veterinarian prescription – are NOT legally required to be sold only through a veterinarian. This is a choice that the veterinary diet industry made, and now it is coming back to bite them.

Federal regulations are very clear, any product (drug, supplement, food) that claims to diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent diseases is considered a drug. The FDA states – specific to veterinary pet foods: “By virtue of their intended use to treat or prevent disease, such products meet the statutory definition of a drug in section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) [21 U.S.C. 321(g)(1)(B)].

Further the FDA states that unless these products have been approved as an Animal Drug – having completed a New Animal Drug Application and being approved, the products would be “adulterated” – exactly as claimed in the lawsuit.

The FDA also makes it very clear that veterinary diets do not meet the requirements of a drug stating: “most dog and cat food products that claim on their labels or in their labeling or other manufacturer communications to treat or prevent disease are not approved new animal drugs, and do not comply with drug registration and listing requirements, or with current good manufacturing practices applicable to drugs even though the products are drugs under the FD&C Act.”

BUT, the FDA also states the agency will ‘look the other way’ (enforcement discretion) and allow these products to violate law “when 1) those products provided all or most of the nutrients in support of the animal’s total required daily nutrient needs, 2) product labels and labeling and other manufacturer communications that were available to the general public (i.e., non-veterinary professionals) did not contain claims to treat or prevent disease, and 3) those products were distributed only through licensed veterinarians.

The catch…

…FDA ‘enforcement discretion’ is not legally binding. The FDA decision of enforcement discretion regarding veterinary diets is ONLY a Compliance Policyit is not a law.

The FDA could have made a regulation that allowed veterinary diets to be sold strictly through veterinarians, but they did not do that. The FDA took a hands-off approach and wrote a Compliance Policy instead of a regulation. FDA’s Compliance Policy Guide on this veterinary diet issue states (at the top of the first page): “This guidance represents the current thinking of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.”

But Hill’s and others that sell veterinary diets did NOT ‘use an alternative approach’. Instead, these pet food manufacturers decided to sell pet foods marketed as a drug that do not meet any legal requirement of a drug based on a nonbinding (not legal) FDA opinion. And further they decided to sell these illegal pet foods at a significantly higher price than other pet foods – taking advantage of consumers.

Personal opinion: Kudos to these pet owner Plaintiffs and lawyers battling this issue out. You are right, they are wrong. Your continued fight has great potential to force some significant change in pet food (regarding other FDA enforcement discretions).

Added 10/11/23: Pet owners who wish to join this class action or learn more information can call 877-265-7656.

Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,

Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food


Become a member of our pet food consumer Association. Association for Truth in Pet Food is a a stakeholder organization representing the voice of pet food consumers at AAFCO and with FDA. Your membership helps representatives attend meetings and voice consumer concerns with regulatory authorities. Click Here to learn more.

What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients?  Chinese imports? Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 5,000 cat foods, dog foods, and pet treats. 30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. Click Here to preview Petsumer Report. www.PetsumerReport.com

Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here


The 2023 List
Susan’s List of trusted pet foods. Click Here to learn more.



The 2023 Treat List
Susan’s List of trusted pet treat manufacturers. Click Here to learn more.

17 Comments

17 Comments

  1. T Allen

    October 3, 2023 at 12:16 pm

    YES! Made my day! Spread the word!

  2. Teresa Johnson

    October 3, 2023 at 4:04 pm

    Yay! I am so happy that FINALLY pet “food” manufacturers of so called prescription diets are being held accountable!

  3. Concerned

    October 3, 2023 at 8:33 pm

    Need to add the Vet Clinics as additional Defendants since most are corporate owned now and received unjust enrichment from this scam:

    To state a claim for unjust enrichment, the Illinois Supreme Court has held that “a plaintiff must allege that the defendant has unjustly retained a benefit to the plaintiff’s detriment, and that defendant’s retention of the benefit violates the fundamental principles of justice, equity, and good conscience

  4. Amy

    October 3, 2023 at 9:20 pm

    Here’s a lawsuit that challeneges the FDA’s non-binding compliance policies. How this plays out will have future ramifications for any compliance policy guide situation. This is great

  5. KH

    October 4, 2023 at 8:36 am

    loving this

  6. Lorraine

    October 4, 2023 at 9:43 am

    I am so happy to see something being done regarding this so-called “prescription” dog food. Many years ago my Vet put my elderly dog on one of Hill’s prescription diets. It cost me a fortune at a time when I was least able to carry that extra expense but I believed the Vet that it would correct my dogs digestive problems. I was furious when I finally found out there was nothing in that food that was medically helping my dog and I could have used a good digestive enzyme supplement that would have been better. When Hills was involved in the 2007 Melamine recall was when I pulled my dogs off of all commercial dog food products and went with raw feeding…never looked back.

    • Samantha

      January 5, 2024 at 2:43 pm

      Hooray– I support your decision totally. Back in the 70’s I decided to feed my newly rescued Siamese kitten–a raw diet–why? Because in the wild cats survive on raw wild meat. She didn’t want kibble, she thrived on raw chicken & chicken necks. When I took her in for a checkup at a new Vet, after he did her exam he asked me what I was feeding her. I told him and he said shocked “I know she’s not getting a balanced diet—but she’s the healthiest cat I’ve seen all day!” She lived to 17 years!

  7. Mary

    October 4, 2023 at 9:54 am

    I’ve been kvetching about the prescription pet food bs for years and I am wondering if there is a similar lawsuit against Royal Canin, which does the same thing as Hills.

  8. donna hansen

    October 4, 2023 at 12:28 pm

    Is this only against Hills? What about Royal Canin?? and Purina?? Those are the 2 brands I’ve been spending $$$ for the past couple of years. 1 cat is diabetic, 1 cat is early kidney disease, 1 dog is on a fat-free diet for extremely high lipids.

    • Susan Thixton

      October 5, 2023 at 8:55 am

      For now, this lawsuit is only about Hill’s. However, this does open the door to future lawsuits against other veterinary diets.

    • Lorraine

      October 5, 2023 at 9:06 am

      Hopefully, if Hills loses this lawsuit, it will make so-called prescription dog food illegal unless there is something in the food that requires a prescription and that will effect Royal Canin and Purina also.

    • Kelley

      October 5, 2023 at 1:28 pm

      Being involved with veterinary medicine for many years, I’ve never thought that the foods were necessarily high quality but some do definitely aid in the management of certain diseases in a manner that is convenient for the owner to purchase. Some owners try to use the diets incorrectly without the proper input concerning the health condition. We never have marked the food up as high as the companies recommend, but we can’t take a loss either. It’s really not a complete racket as suggested. Maybe a partial racket 🙂

    • Kelley

      October 5, 2023 at 1:30 pm

      Donna- the conditions you mention can benefit greatly from a prescription diet. Diabetic animals, renal disease and PLE really must have special diets.

      • Kyle

        October 9, 2023 at 4:52 pm

        There is nothing in those foods that have a formulation that cannot be more readily created with a fresh diet for a fraction of the cost.

        • Kelley

          October 13, 2023 at 7:29 am

          Kyle, they have everything needed to cure! You can create nothing.

          • Lorraine

            October 13, 2023 at 10:16 am

            Kelly, these foods do not “”CURE”” anything. Even Hills stops short of saying they cure an illness. The advertising states “it helps manage” which is a far cry from curing. And yes, a person can put together a fresh diet that “helps manage” an illness.

  9. Kelley M

    October 14, 2023 at 10:28 pm

    I didn’t make that comment. I think someone used my name. I know that they don’t cure anything. But the average pet owner will not take the time to make their pet’s food. Let alone get it balanced correctly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Learn More

Human Grade & Feed Grade
Do you know what the differences are between Feed Grade and Human Grade pet food? Click Here.

 

The Regulations
Pet Food is regulated by federal and state authorities. Unfortunately, authorities ignore many safety laws. Click Here to learn more about the failures of the U.S. pet food regulatory system.

 

The Many Styles of Pet Food
An overview of the categories, styles, legal requirements and recall data of commercial pet food in the U.S. Click Here.

 

The Ingredients
Did you know that all pet food ingredients have a separate definition than the same ingredient in human food? Click Here.

Click Here for definitions of animal protein ingredients.

Click Here to calculate carbohydrate percentage in your pet’s food.

 

Sick Pet Caused by a Pet Food?

If your pet has become sick or has died you believe is linked to a pet food, it is important to report the issue to FDA and your State Department of Agriculture.

Save all pet food – do not return it for a refund.

If your pet required veterinary care, ask your veterinarian to report to FDA.

Click Here for FDA and State contacts.

The List

The Treat List

Special Pages to Visit

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Click Here

Pet Food Recall History (2007 to present)
Click Here

Find Healthy Pet Foods Stores
Click Here

About TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

Friends of TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

You May Also Like