A new paper gives pet owners clues into the current investigation of heart disease in dogs linked to pet food.
“Diet-associated dilated cardiomyopathy in dogs: what do we know?” was recently published on Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association website. The paper gives pet owners clues to what veterinarians are looking at investigating heart disease issues linked to pet food.
Quotes from the paper:
“Diet-associated DCM first came to light in cats in the late 1980s and in dogs in the mid-1990s. The association between diet and DCM in dogs has generally not been much in the news since the early 2000s, but over the past few years, an increasing number of DCM cases involving dogs appear to have been related to diet. The extent of this issue is not clear, not all cases have been confirmed to be linked to diet, and a true association has not been proven to exist.”
“The recent announcement from the US FDA alerting pet owners and veterinarians about reports of DCM in dogs eating pet foods containing peas, lentils, other legume seeds, or potatoes as main ingredients has raised concerns among the pet-owning public. Therefore, we wanted to increase awareness of this issue among veterinarians, review what is currently known about the possible association between certain diets and DCM in dogs, and discuss what veterinarians can do to help identify underlying causes.“
“Recently, however, we have heard from veterinary cardiologists who had an impression that they were diagnosing DCM in Golden Retrievers at higher rates than expected and in dogs of breeds typically not thought to be prone to this condition. Subjectively, it also appeared that these dogs were frequently eating BEG (BEG stands for Boutique companies, Exotic ingredients, Grain-free) diets containing foodstuffs such as kangaroo, duck, buffalo, salmon, lamb, bison, venison, lentils, peas, fava beans, tapioca, barley, or chickpeas as major ingredients. Some of the affected dogs had low plasma or whole blood taurine concentrations and improved with taurine supplementation and a diet change. On the other hand, some dogs that did not have low plasma or whole blood taurine concentrations also improved with a diet change and taurine supplementation. Cardiologists and other veterinarians have been reporting cases to the US FDA, which is investigating the issue.”
Part of the difficulty for scientists and FDA investigation into the cause of pet food related heart disease in dogs is that some dogs had low taurine blood levels, while others showed normal taurine blood levels. To add further challenges to the investigation: “not all diets were grain-free diets“.
The paper explains the difficulty of reaching the ‘Complete and Balanced’ claim stated on pet food labels for pet food manufacturers…
“The complexity of pet food manufacturing is often underestimated. Pet foods must contain all required nutrients in the right amounts and right proportions. Nutrient standards (minimums and, for some nutrients, maximums) are established by the Association of American Feed Control Officials. However, the effects of processing (or not processing) the ingredients must also be considered, along with nutrient bioavailability and the effects of all other ingredients in the food. Unfortunately, this may not always be done. In addition, extensive testing is needed on an ongoing basis to ensure rigorous quality control. Inclusion of exotic ingredients, such as kangaroo, alligator, fava beans, and lentils, adds another level of complexity to ensuring the diet is nutritious and healthy. Exotic ingredients have different nutritional profiles and different digestibility than typical ingredients and have the potential to affect the metabolism of other nutrients. For example, the bioavailability of taurine is different when included in a lamb-based diet, compared with a chicken-based diet, and can be affected by the amount and types of fiber in the diet.“
The above emphasizes a concern for pet owners. AAFCO establishes the nutrient profiles pet food manufacturers are required to meet, AAFCO defines all pet food ingredients including those “exotic ingredients” mentioned in this paper.
But, AAFCO definitions do NOT take into account the bioavailability of those ingredients. This brings back into discussion the needed pet food ingredient standards that were just deleted by a Congressional Committee (deletion of these necessary pet food regulations was submitted by Senator Rand Paul). If pet food was required to have ingredient standards, the
bioavailability of each pet food ingredient could have been required.
And the nutritional profiles mentioned in the above quote are established by AAFCO. AAFCO nutritional standards are the most absolute minimum, and they take no consideration of bioavailability of those nutrients.
More quotes from the paper:
“Possible causes that are being investigated include absolute deficiencies of other nutrients, altered bioavailability of certain nutrients because of nutrient-nutrient interactions, and the inadvertent inclusion of toxic ingredients.“
And perhaps the most concerning statement (bold added)…
“Researchers are also exploring whether diet-associated DCM in dogs without taurine deficiency may be related to inclusion of a cardiotoxic ingredient in the diet. This could be an adulterated ingredient, as with ingredients containing melamine–cyanuric acid that affected pet foods in 2007, resulting in extensive recalls; a heavy metal; a chemical sprayed on 1 of the ingredients; or even a natural chemical compound in 1 of the ingredients that has toxic effects when fed in large amounts.“
How long will it take scientists or regulatory authorities to locate the ‘adulterated ingredient’?
How long will it take to make a connection of a heavy metal link to canine heart disease?
How long will it take to make a connection of a ‘chemical’ or ‘natural compound’ to canine heart disease?
Why hasn’t FDA updated pet owners since mid- July about this information?
No answers to too many questions for pet owners.
Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,
Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food
Become a member of our pet food consumer Association.
Association for Truth in Pet Food is a a stakeholder organization
representing the voice of pet food consumers at AAFCO and with FDA. Your
membership helps representatives attend meetings and voice consumer
concerns with regulatory authorities. Click Here to learn more.
What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients? Chinese imports? Petsumer
Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 5,000 cat foods, dog foods,
and pet treats. 30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. Click Here to preview Petsumer Report. www.PetsumerReport.com
The 2019 List
Susan’s List of trusted pet foods. Click Here to learn more.
Have you read Buyer Beware? Click Here
Cooking pet food made easy, Dinner PAWsible
Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here
Donna
December 10, 2018 at 3:00 pm
And yet they continue to say it is not safe to home-cook or feed raw.
Janice
December 10, 2018 at 3:26 pm
On Balance It, a website run by a veterinary nutritionist from UC Davis (where research on DCM is ongoing), one can find free recipes for home-cooked meals. You can choose your protein source (within limits), fats, and carbohydrates (e.g., grains, vegetables, and fruits). The recipes are free but you would need to purchase the supplement to balance the meal, which in fact is extremely helpful to those trying to produce balanced home-cooked meals. Many objections of animal nutritionists stem from the fact that not all home-cooking is nutritionally balanced. If you have wanted to do home-cooking but find the nutritional aspect daunting, you might want to check out this site. (By the way, I have no connection to the site other than the fact that I use it in making our dog’s food.)
Susan Thixton
December 10, 2018 at 4:05 pm
When I checked last (a couple of years ago), some of the supplements from Balance It are sourced from China. That is not necessarily a bad thing, everything from China is not adulterated. But, consumers want to know that information which when I last checked was not disclosed on the Balance It website.
Janice
December 10, 2018 at 5:37 pm
The website does discuss this. As I recall, it says that about 99% of supplements are NOT from China, and explains the situation with the other small percent. Also, it explains that all the supplements are human grade.
Susan Thixton
December 10, 2018 at 5:58 pm
Things must have changed then – good to know. Thank you.
Doryan Jarrell-Flathau
December 11, 2018 at 1:17 am
That’s because they want money for their business, not because they care about the animals.
Debi Cohen
December 11, 2018 at 6:56 am
Right so on Donna !!!!!!!!
T Allen
December 10, 2018 at 3:19 pm
That covered everything except the one issue my vet and I discussed last week, Peas and legumes are deficient in amino acids that are in meat and when the total protein on the label says 26% that isn’t 26% usable MEAT protein to the dog but includes who knows how much inferior plant protein. Cardiac issues due to protein deficiency? Possible. Thanks Susan!
Pet Owner
December 10, 2018 at 5:14 pm
I must be stupid but I don’t understand why it can’t be determined the correct percentages of how much protein, to carb, to fat, the ratio should be. And how much (and which) vitamins and minerals a dog needs. People have been feeding dogs PF for 60 years. And as long as the food isn’t contaminated, they’ve been doing pretty well. Isn’t the real issue the fact that “grain-free” stuff is being added to the food in place of necessary protein and supporting ingredients. Why is this such a problem to figure out!
Is this just another form of the FDA and AAFCO protecting big industry pet food companies so they won’t be forced into changing their formulas, which generate higher revenue?
Jutta
December 10, 2018 at 6:24 pm
I do find euthanized and decomposed animal ingredients way more “exotic” than a healthy buffalo. I am not sure we are dealing with one single toxic ingredient. Feeding dogs and cats like hogs and cattle being fattened up for slaughter, with massive amounts of carbs, most of if GM junk, sprayed with Roundup. Add the mycotoxins and heavens knows what else from rotten garbage recycled into pet food, plastic wrappers and cattle eartags. Add the garbage fed to farm animals, the many, many drugs they receive. Legal and otherwise. What they ate, what was given to them, ends up in pet feed.
And “scientists” are just now wondering? Where have they been all these years? Asleep at their desk? Did they just crawl out from under a large rock and learn just now what has been allowed into “pet food”? Give me a break.
Susan Thixton
December 10, 2018 at 7:07 pm
Thanks so much for your comment. I might borrow this line: “I do find euthanized and decomposed animal ingredients way more “exotic” than a healthy buffalo.” Priceless!
mary beth polek
December 10, 2018 at 10:28 pm
As a veterinarian for over 20 years I am so glad I found your site. Most (consumers and veterinarians) are unaware of the pet food industry’s poor practices. We need to educate the masses in a large way. I try to do it everyday with my clients.
Pingback: Does ‘Grain Free’ food lead to Heart Disease? – Lucy's Kitchen
Denise
January 12, 2019 at 11:17 am
So what dog food is safe? My dog has arthritis so we currently feed him purina pro plan for joint health and give him turmeric, fish oil, glucosamine with chondroitin and coconut oil to help inflammation and his joints