Recently published in the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, “Changes in diet and supplement use in dogs with cancer” looked at what dogs were fed prior to and after a cancer diagnosis. While this type of research would certainly be beneficial to pet owners, in this case the researchers went off track and appeared to present their data with a specific goal in mind.
The study is from the University of California, Davis Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, all participants were patients at the UC Davis hospital.
Dr. Jean Dodds reviewed the research, and found that in the middle of a paper supposedly related to dog cancer, the UC Davis Veterinary School researchers began discussing grain-free pet food and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). And…the UC Davis researchers attempted to plant the seed of a possible link between grain free pet food and cancer.
Quoting the UC Davis paper (bold added):
“There has been considerable attention to the association between dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in dogs and the use of grain-free diets, and both veterinarians and pet owners might have increased awareness of this issue. Regardless, given that more than 1 in 5 dogs in the present study were fed a grain-free diet before a cancer diagnosis, this data highlights the need for clinicians to discuss the risk of diet-associated DCM with all dog owners.”
But…Dr. Dodds saw through the UC Davis potential plan to mislead readers.
Quoting Dr. Dodds review of the paper (bold added):
“Once we read the statement, which could alarm the audience, ‘more than 1 in 5 dogs in the present study were fed a grain-free diet before a cancer diagnosis…’ We delved into the numbers.
Let’s flip the statement: more than 1 in 5 dogs. The ‘more than’ is actually 22% in this study. So, that means that more than 3 in 4 dogs (78%) were fed a grain-inclusive diet prior to cancer diagnosis.”
Why would these researchers draw attention a 22% statistic (dogs fed grain-free dog food prior to cancer diagnosis) and completely ignore a 78% statistic (dogs fed a grain-inclusive dog food prior to cancer diagnosis)? What was their motivation to ignore their own data showing the majority of dogs in the study were fed a grain-inclusive dog food prior to a cancer diagnosis?
Perhaps the other issue Dr. Dodds spotted is a potential explanation… (from Dr. Dodds post) …
“The study authors became focused on the grain-free and home-prepared diet issues, such that their comments appeared skewed.
For example:
- ‘Kibble’ is mentioned in the text only once;
- ‘Raw’ is mentioned four times;
- ‘Grain-free’ is mentioned eight times;
- ‘Grain-based’ or ‘grain-inclusive’ is never mentioned; and,
- ‘Home-prepared’ is mentioned 31 times.”
What Dr. Dodds pointed out is significant to consider.
Were the researchers of UC Davis Veterinary School attempting to make a (misleading) link between grain-free dog food and dog cancer?
Were their actions in the paper intentional – did they knowingly try to shift the reader’s attention to create a misleading link of grain-free dog food to dog cancer? Or was it unintentional – is this paper evidence that some researchers have such a skewed perspective (perhaps influenced by Big Pet Feed donations) they cannot see the forest for the trees?
Pet owners can read the full UC Davis paper HERE.
Pet owners can read Dr. Jean Dodds review of the UC Davis paper HERE.
Our thanks to Dr. Dodds for her close look into this misleading research.
Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,
Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food
Become a member of our pet food consumer Association. Association for Truth in Pet Food is a a stakeholder organization representing the voice of pet food consumers at AAFCO and with FDA. Your membership helps representatives attend meetings and voice consumer concerns with regulatory authorities. Click Here to learn more.
What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients? Chinese imports? Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 5,000 cat foods, dog foods, and pet treats. 30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. Click Here to preview Petsumer Report. www.PetsumerReport.com
Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here
The 2023 List
Susan’s List of trusted pet foods. Click Here to learn more.
The 2023 Treat List
Susan’s List of trusted pet treat manufacturers. Click Here to learn more.
Debra Ulrich
August 24, 2023 at 11:35 am
Thank you Susan and Dr Dodd!!
Debra Ulrich
August 24, 2023 at 11:37 am
Correction!
Dr Dodds!!
Dianne & pets
August 24, 2023 at 11:42 am
By all means, they also did not even consider the possibility that pesticide residue or gmo ingredients could be a factor.
Barbara Fellnermayr
August 24, 2023 at 2:56 pm
Thanks Dr. Dodds & Susan.
Why aren’t they focussing on the 78%. Because it doesn’t suit their needs. Aside from the other glaring errors that Dr. Dodds has pointed out, I would ask who paid for the study?
Traditionally, almost exclusively, the one that pays for the report and research gets the report & research skewed in their favor. As clearly demonstrated by the numbers, not only 22% vs 78%, but times kibble, raw food, homemade etc were mentioned.
Another report that’s not worth the paper it’s written on! I wouldn’t let my dog pee or poo on it!
Sheila Black
August 24, 2023 at 3:24 pm
The dishonest pet food companies and their paid sycophants cannot be trusted; because their end goal is profit, not the health of our pets. That is why I learned how to raw feed my two cats.