AAFCO has told me I cannot update pet food consumers on TruthaboutPetFood.com to any information provided in new AAFCO Pet Food Labeling working group. I can only provide information on AssociationforTruthinPetFood.com and only when allowed.
In the past, other AAFCO working groups have been more transparent and allowed all members to share at almost any time. The Pet Food Label Modernization working group is not the same.
The rules for the Pet Food Label Modernization working group are that no member of the working group can share information with their group’s members until the working group votes on a particular issue discussed. Then, information can only be shared in a non-public setting – no information will be allowed to become public for quite some time.
This means that when I am allowed to share information from the Pet Food Label Modernization working group, I cannot share it on TruthaboutPetFood.com for input from all pet food consumers. I and every member of the group can only share information non-publicly such as on members only secure pages of AssociationforTruthinPetFood.com.
I have no choice but to abide by AAFCO rules. As AAFCO requires, information will be shared only on the Association website and only when I am allowed to share. My apologies to pet owners – this is not my choice. It is AAFCO’s Pet Food Committee’s choice.
For consumers that want to know of and provide input on AAFCO issues, please join the association. I have no choice but to put all AAFCO information there – behind secured pages. The only exception will be AAFCO public meetings (next one begins August 1). There are two new posts on the Association website for consumers to read, one of which I am requesting consumer input.
To industry…you got your way didn’t you? You won the battle…wonder if you’ll win the war?
Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,
Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food
What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients? Chinese imports? Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 4,000 cat foods, dog foods, and pet treats. 30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. www.PetsumerReport.com
The 2016 List
Susan’s List of trusted pet foods. Click Here
Have you read Buyer Beware? Click Here
Cooking for pets made easy, Dinner PAWsible
Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here
Holly
July 5, 2016 at 12:04 pm
… and what would happened if information were shared with consumers?
Susan Thixton
July 5, 2016 at 12:07 pm
I would be removed from the Committee/working group.
Laurie Raymond
July 5, 2016 at 12:45 pm
I understand that you are bound to abide by this. But what about members who have access to your members-only website sharing with consumers?
Susan Thixton
July 5, 2016 at 1:00 pm
Consumer members are bound to the same requirements. Our Association – is bound to AAFCO requirements. Nothing can be public information until AAFCO decides it can be public. There will be notices to such on all posts that provide non-public information (on the Association website).
Sue
July 5, 2016 at 12:49 pm
Sounds like they have a lot to hide. It’s ridiculous that joining is the only way to get information that we as consumers and pet owners should have access to. Not to mention the fee involved. As someone on a limited income I don’t have money to spare, not even $10/year; that would take away from my pets. I’m so sorry this happened to you (and to all of us).
Jan
July 5, 2016 at 3:28 pm
I’m in the same boat as you, Sue. And as one who has several physically disabling health conditions it is necessary to put my $$ not only to keeping my cat in the best of health but myself as well. At what point will Americans wake up and say enough is enough?
Pacific Sun
July 7, 2016 at 1:32 am
It’s okay to be critical of AAFCO for not allowing public discussion. But not of Susan who’s been required to restrict information to ATPF membership (Association for Truth in Pet Food). Many professional organizations have such limitations, protecting confidentiality, so that all members can speak freely, until consensus is reached.
Without the Association (representing Pet Owners) Susan was denied membership. The Association had to be formed for Susan to be considered a Consumer Stakeholder and entitled to participate in the AAFCO meetings and sub-committees. Her voice and influence is critical to our purpose. Yet she takes a lot of verbal abuse and her documented input is often thoughtlessly dismissed. It costs money to be a member, for subscription materials, and to travel! VERY expensive. She is frequently on conference calls during the week (more time and labor) and yet turns out very regular TAPF articles on many topics.
The overall benefit of ALL her work is provided absolutely FREE to everyone who Follows TAPF!
So for the price of ONE office visit to a Vet, that a pet hasn’t needed, being saved from some illness due to bad pet food – any amount of a donation could be made for ATPF membership! Actually this is about the principle of VISIBLY supporting Susan in the first place! Wouldn’t you guess that encouragement and vote of confidence is important.
If we can’t do this small thing, for work that has saved the health of pets, then a bunch of comments certainly shrink in value!
Sue Meigs
July 5, 2016 at 1:21 pm
I’m surprised that they let you tell us that you’re not allowed to tell us! ?
Peg
July 5, 2016 at 1:26 pm
FBOMB
The amount of lawless and corrupt organizations in this country are frightening.
I am with Sue……..they have a lot to hide.
I think this “keep it quiet” info should be spread far and wide.
The “Secret Society of Pet Food Rulers”
Sharon
July 5, 2016 at 1:45 pm
So much for celebrating our independence yesterday. Our government has been taken over by corporate interests. There are very few working for the citizenry anymore. We have become a country whose government represents industry and creating wealth first. Everything else–including health and safety are secondary.
Susan Deleon
July 5, 2016 at 2:23 pm
Do you pay first and then are able to register at the new site?
My payments come from my pet store bank account. Will that effect how I sign up?
Sue
Susan Thixton
July 5, 2016 at 2:37 pm
You do purchase a membership, then you should received a registration link in a follow up email. If you have problems – let me know (email).
Pat P.
July 5, 2016 at 3:27 pm
There should be NOTHING happening to our pets’ food that can’t be shared publicly! AAFCO’s exclusion from pet owners what is going on behind closed doors is inexcusable and should be unconstitutional, but its similar to what is happening with our human food, Monsanto and GMO labeling. The majority of our citizens want our food labeled. The FDA, the USDA and AAFCO are working against public and animal health, instead of for us.
Pres. Jimmy Carter just recently stated that our country has become an oligarchy. Many of us already know that, but hearing him mention it publicly is a profound warning and frightening, at best. For animal lovers, it should mean, at the very least, to only vote for politicians that show they care about them with their votes in Congress and state elections!
Unfortunately, not enough people know the truth about the ownership of our government and its politicians.
Dianne & pets
July 6, 2016 at 3:02 pm
In other words, the states have become what they most fear, another Russia.
Pacific Sun
July 7, 2016 at 12:08 pm
Read the article again. We may not like AAFCO’s viewpoint. But it is a professional working group. Members are from Agri-Business and PFI. Not government. What is discussed could be (at times) proprietary information. And trade is very competitive.
We have FEW direct opportunities to affect good changes in human food & labeling. But here, we have one trusted Consumer Advocate (with absolute integrity) speaking entirely on our behalf!! For that privilege and advantage, for a membership restriction and small fee, so be it. If we’re grousing about a donation that amounts to 2 Starbuck Lattes, then are we also going to complain about an increase in the price of quality PF.
As to politics, this Country is exactly the opposite of an oligarchy. In fact it is in a state of chaos. Which government tries to hide. People crave leadership while the majority fears change! So make a guess about November. And the status quo will continue as no business as usual.
As for animal lovers to effect change, means being vocal and visible. Voting against incumbents who ignore your issues. And that can be done on a State level. As one TAPF article explained, on a State level, the PFI has been allowed to violate law!
Unbelievable as it seems, government and the control of politicians actually IS in the hands of the Voters. Politicians can’t cut bad deals, if they aren’t in Office.
And yes you are correct. People just don’t believe in that truth!
Juno's mom
July 5, 2016 at 4:28 pm
So much for free speech and information. Yes, they are hiding.
Jude
July 5, 2016 at 4:31 pm
What ever happened to our right to free speech as guaranteed by our Constitution? This is most disturbing.
Sharon J.
July 5, 2016 at 5:04 pm
More government secrets . . . God Bless America!
SueB
July 5, 2016 at 7:10 pm
“Nothing can be public information until AAFCO decides it can be public.” Can you post the names of these AAFCO people & where they are, so they cannot hide behind an Association moniker?
Andrea
July 5, 2016 at 7:16 pm
What I’d like to know is how the h### AAFCO thinks it’s their ‘right’ to keep throwing more layers of wool over pet food consumer’s eyes. I joined the association, and after reading a little bit, I am absolutely disgusted in their behavior, even more than ever before! I will, of course abide by the rules, but it certainly does make my blood boil! All of this should fall under Freedom of Information.
danuta radko
July 5, 2016 at 11:28 pm
Lets call it communism, lived their, not good
Cherie Holverson
July 5, 2016 at 11:58 pm
Well here goes our government again. Everyone please think about who u are voting for this election and how much more of your civil rights you are u willing to give up! I cook my own food for my dogs. Should we have to do that, NO. But we do, to protect our animals.
Caron
July 6, 2016 at 2:57 am
What do they have to hide?
This only makes me want to make more of my own cat’s food. To hell with them. I’m tired of these greedy, elitist corporate controlled agencies that only work for Big Ag and not what’s best for our animals
Pet food has no right to be treated like a nuclear secret.
Linda
July 19, 2016 at 10:41 am
How can I spread this info to the public?
Susan Thixton
July 19, 2016 at 12:07 pm
Linda – you can share this post anywhere. The more consumers learn what is happening, the better.