“And passed.” USDA inspected ‘and passed’. These two words are significantly important to finding a quality pet food.
Because all regulatory authorities (FDA and each State Department of Agriculture) allow condemned animals/animal parts into pet food…
Quoting FDA Compliance Policy Guides:
Pet food consisting of material from diseased animals or animals which have died otherwise than by slaughter…will be considered fit for animal consumption.
…consumers are forced into becoming Pet Food Private Investigators. One of the most important tasks to discover about their pet’s food is quality of ingredients.
Ask your pet food manufacturer: Are meat ingredients USDA inspected and passed? Or you could ask: Are meat ingredients human edible?
As simple as the question is, in most cases the pet food manufacturer response is not so simple.
Some pet food manufacturers will respond with: ‘Yes, all of our meat ingredients are sourced from USDA inspected facilities.’
This does not answer your question. Condemned meats are sourced ‘from USDA facilities’. You can ask again reminding them your question was specific to the meat ingredients, not the facility they came from.
Some pet food manufacturers will tell consumers it is illegal for any pet food manufacturer to claim ingredients are human edible, explaining to an unknowing consumer that when any pet food ingredient enters a pet food facility it is considered feed grade and is no longer human edible.
This response is in part true. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is the governing body over meat and all foods containing more than 3% meat…excluding pet food. In human foods, meats and foods containing more than 3% meat are required to be processed under USDA inspection – this provides the consumer with a level of assurance the ingredients abide by law. But because pet foods fall under FDA jurisdiction, they are NOT required to be processed under USDA inspection (unless they are Human Grade pet foods). The USDA and FDA don’t work together (often), thus the USDA refuses to allow inspected and passed meat ingredients to be classified as USDA inspected and passed unless they are destined for a USDA regulated food manufacturing facility – which pet food manufacturing facilities are not.
But…the part of this response that can be questioned is: Regardless to this jurisdiction battle between USDA and FDA, the meats that end up in pet food remain either inspected and passed or not inspected/passed. The pet food manufacturer invoice receipts declare if the meats purchased are USDA inspected and passed or not inspected/passed – and the consumer deserves to know which is in their pet’s food. If your pet food manufacturer gives you this response, follow up with a question such as: I understand that the USDA does not allow the claim of USDA inspected and passed to be used outside of a USDA inspected facility, but when you purchase the ingredients…prior to their arrival at your pet food manufacturing facility…were those meat ingredients USDA inspected and passed? Do your invoice receipts state edible meats or inedible?
And even though the knowledge to whether your pet’s food contains quality USDA inspected and passed meats or not is significantly important to the health of your pet, unfortunately consumers have little means to verify what a manufacturer tells them. Consumers have the right to ask for verification to quality of meat ingredients (such as a copy of invoice receipts), but it is doubtful that many will provide it. A few willingly and openly provide any verification you ask for, but most refuse. Consumers are expected to trust them.
Personal note: I’ve asked for verification to quality of ingredients from many pet food manufacturers over the years of doing this work. When companies refuse to provide the information – claiming it is proprietary – my thoughts are: they don’t trust me with their proprietary information, but I am expected to trust them with my pet’s life. Not a fair exchange of trust in my opinion.
For those that have difficulty trusting their pet’s life to a food without quality of ingredient verification, your other option is Human Grade pet foods. Human Grade pet foods are held to the same manufacturing standards as human food – manufactured at a facility under constant USDA inspection, 100% of ingredients including supplements are human edible. Consumers CAN trust the claim of ‘Human Grade’ on a pet food label – regulatory authorities scrutinize the claim of Human Grade on pet food labels. Consumers CANNOT trust the claim of ‘Human Grade’ on a pet food website. Unfortunately, regulatory authorities do not scrutinize claims on pet food websites – many pet food websites make misleading/false claims.
Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,
Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food
Become a member of our pet food consumer Association. Association for Truth in Pet Food is a a stakeholder organization representing the voice of pet food consumers at AAFCO and with FDA. Your membership helps representatives attend meetings and voice consumer concerns with regulatory authorities. Click Here to learn more.
What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients? Chinese imports? Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 5,000 cat foods, dog foods, and pet treats. 30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. Click Here to preview Petsumer Report. www.PetsumerReport.com
The 2018 List
Susan’s List of trusted pet foods. Click Here to learn more.
Have you read Buyer Beware? Click Here
Cooking pet food made easy, Dinner PAWsible
Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here
Jane
July 10, 2018 at 3:02 pm
Speaking of “Human Grade” claims on websites…
Do you know if any of the lawsuits involving Evanger’s have been settled? I think there were at least 3 – Evanger’s v Bailey Farms, Party Animal v Evanger’s, and the class action suit initiated by the family who lost their pup. There may have been an additional class action suit, as well. It was getting hard to keep track!
They seem to have permanently removed the “Human Grade” claim from their website. And they say that they’ve closed the old plant and moved production to their newer facility. But I’m curious about what happened with the lawsuits.
Thanks for keeping us informed so we can take good care of our furry family members!
Susan Thixton
July 10, 2018 at 3:57 pm
To my knowledge, none of the lawsuits have been settled.
Jane
July 10, 2018 at 6:38 pm
Thanks, Susan!
Pingback: The Two Most Important Words of Pet Food Meat Ingredients - Pet News Hound
Ian
July 10, 2018 at 4:38 pm
“they don’t trust me with their proprietary information, but I am expected to trust them with my pet’s life” — SO TRUE. I also continue to wish that labels must say who actually manufactures the food if it is contracted out to a co-packer.
landsharkinnc
July 11, 2018 at 9:07 am
I don’t think rotten carrots, slimy greens or dried legumes or grains past their ‘prime’, not to mention ‘contaminated’, or left over restaurant food has any business in a ‘food’ product either … if it’s not fit to for my family, it shouldn’t be fit for my animals either.
chris
July 11, 2018 at 11:51 am
Proprietary is the word they tell me when I ask about organic ingredients in my food. I won’t buy from someone who will not share with me the ingredients nor for my dog.
Ms. B Dawson
July 21, 2018 at 10:45 am
Susan-
Cornucopia Institute just sent around a piece about the USDA Secretary killing off a bunch of regulations for the organic industry. One of the comments also referenced pet food: ..” In recent months, shelved proposals have included those covering animal welfare, the manufacture of pet food and beekeeping.”…
Any idea what proposals were shelved? There’s so much going on anymore, it’s hard to determine what’s being referenced.
Thanks for any info,
B
Ms. B Dawson
July 21, 2018 at 10:53 am
Susan – Never mind…I should do a little more research before bugging you.
USDA killed off “new standards for manufacturing organic pet food, the latter of which had been sought by the industry for more than a decade.”
Figures….
B