Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Pet Food News

When the Going Gets Tough

The tough get going! Nay-sayers were bashing our test results again. Negative comments from a ‘pet food brand ambassador’ vet. Misleading and inaccurate complaints from an industry lab. The truth hurts – unless the truth is on your side.

The tough get going! Nay-sayers were bashing our test results again. Negative comments from a ‘pet food brand ambassador’ vet. Misleading and inaccurate complaints from an industry lab. The truth hurts – unless the truth is on your side.

Back in January when we released our pet food test results, nay-sayers came out of retirement to bash. A veterinarian – Dr. Jessica Vogelsang – whose website states “This blog accepts forms of cash advertising, sponsorship, paid insertions or other forms of compensation. The compensation received may influence the advertising content, topics or posts made in this blog.” mocked our results. Not one of the bashers bothered to contact me or our scientists – they just opened their mouth and inserted their foot.

What the critics didn’t like, was our results were paid for by consumers and the results were for consumers. Results for consumers – just like what is provided to consumers by veterinarians or human physicians – don’t include methodology. But the critics didn’t like that. They wanted it their way, not our way. It’s easy to criticize when a square peg doesn’t fit in their round hole.

And recently, a television station in my own backyard joined in the bashing, almost appearing to defend Beneful Dog Food in the midst of a lawsuit. This television station went to the Pet Food Institute (trade association representing Big Pet Food) for comment, and our non-friend there Kurt Gallagher (the very same Kurt Gallagher who purchased the domain names TruthaboutPetFood.org and .net on behalf of the PFI) directed this journalist to none other than Dr. Jessica Vogelsang – the very same vet mentioned above that offers herself as a “Brand Ambassador”. (Some of the brands she has worked with include Iams, Eukanuba, Innova, and Hill’s Science Diet. I’ll let you form your own opinion if her ‘brand ambassador’ duties could have included defending the brands we tested.)

And Mr. Kurt of PFI also directed this television station to the lab who performed the mycotoxin results for us, the very same lab that had our press release announcing the Pet Food Test results pulled from the internet within a day of its release. The statement the lab provided:  “A spokesperson wrote in an email, “I can confirm to you that the samples, which were quite small, were given to our labs without any branding or commercial packaging, so we have no means of verifying that any of the results match particular products.”

The lab complained they received blind samples – something that is standard in testing when unbiased results are wanted. And they complained that the samples were “quite small” when they themselves established the sample size. Anyone that knows the slightest bit about product testing knows that blind samples are common and sample size is always determined by the lab.

But for some reason, this television station didn’t understand this simple truth about product testing. And when the original story aired, they did not include the statement from our scientist provided to them. Which said…

I am not sure what was said to you by Alltech.

On March 17th I attended professional meetings  for the ASAS Midwestern Section and ADSA Midwest Branch . At one of the talks, an Alltech scientist presented data regarding their 37+ Program that is used to evaluate North American feedstuffs for multiple mycotoxins using ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) methodology developed at Alltech’ s Global Research Headquarters, KY, USA.

The information that was presented has been added to my collection of materials from Alltech that define their methods and level of scientific expertise.

The pet products that were tested were sent to our office from :
Susan Thixton
Pet Food Consumer Advocate
TruthaboutPetFood.com
AssociationforTruthinPetFood.com

All pet product samples were sent to Alltech for testing. Test results received from Alltech were reported to Sue Thixton, as received from Alltech. Alltech Scientists used the following headings on the reports: Toxins;  Amount , ppb; Low Risk; Medium Risk; and High Risk.

Explanations of these categories and the significance of having combinations of mycotoxins was not written by INTI Service. The Alltech interpretation of their reporting methods are available in many sources. Alltech emphasizes  “there is a need to analyze multiple mycotoxins using sensitive quantitative tests” and that “different forms of mycotoxins interact among each other to increase overall toxicity even when they are present even at smaller concentrations.”

The comprehensive testing that was done by the 37+ Program is typically more advanced and sensitive to mycotoxins than what is commonly used by pet food companies with their rapid testing (TLC and ElSA) of incoming ingredients. Alltech considers the TLC and ELISA methods as “not providing a good appreciation of the overall mycotoxin challenge coming from the simultaneous presence of multiple groups of mycotoxins in a feed material.”

After some…let’s call it unpleasant correspondence between me and the television journalist that did this bashing story…the television station posted a follow up response from our scientist.

“I am a full member of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences  and in 2012, I received the General Achievement Award. The field of forensics is governed by a specific set of scientific and ethical guidelines that  surpass scientists not bound by the Forensic community.

The samples received by our professionals at INTI, were processed according to procedures defined according to the type of investigations that are requested. All products came “as is” from the store they were purchased. Each product was photographed and given an identification number to prevent laboratory bias for a specific brand of product.

The only person allowed to send proper representative samples was a trained research scientist with a BS, MS, and PhD.

I have over 29 years of experience in evaluating animal feed and health claims and I am qualified to testify as an expert witness in almost every state and in Federal courts.

Alltech’ s comments do not indicate the exhaustive conversation our head researcher Dr. Tsengeg Purevjav had with Alltech scientists regarding the scope and required accuracy of the tests that were under consideration.

All sample sizes were done with the full direction of Alltech Scientists. At no time was INTI Service or Dr. Purevjav contacted by Alltech to indicate the samples were too small or not handled properly. At no time did Alltech Scientists ask for addition samples or any other information except to get their invoice paid.

The results of the tests conducted by Alltech were reviewed in phone conversations between Dr. Purevjav and Alltech scientists. In addition, all Alltech supplied  documents were used before, during, and after direct contact with Alltech Scientists.

The presenter at the 2015 Midwest Animal Science meetings in Des Moines on March 17 contradicted what Alltech told you :”It is not intended to be representative of a toxicological risk.”

When the going gets tough, the tough get going!

For the record, four months later (after our results were published), not one pet food company has bothered to contact me. Not one of the pet foods we tested has asked me or our scientists for testing methods. Not one regulatory authority has reached out to our scientists to discuss the findings. Could it be that they all know we did our testing exactly right and they have no way to defend what we found in pet food?

Another weak attempt to discredit the effort of determined pet food consumers. Long story short, our Pet Food Test results stand firm.

But I do have a question for nay-sayers. If we did things so wrong, please enlighten us on how to properly test pet food. Be specific. Share with us your insight on proper testing methods. What do you recommend?

How very sad that some in media are so gullible. How very sad that no one other than educated consumers (who almost all learned the hard way) and a handful of brave veterinarians are questioning how waste feed ingredients can become ‘complete and balanced’ nutrition for pets. How very sad that most lawmakers ignore that FDA openly allows pet food/animal feed to violate federal food safety law. How very sad that FDA believes recycled waste is nutrition.

And…How very sad that pet food consumers had to spend their own money to test pet food – found startling risks – and no regulatory authority lifts a finger to investigate.

One more time. When the going gets tough, the tough get going. We – pet food consumers – are one tough bunch. We’ve been bashed and battered, our pets have been killed or sickened, and all regulatory authorities and many so called experts continue to turn a deaf ear to us. I hope they all hear this – we have only begun to fight.

 

Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,

Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food

What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients?  Chinese imports?  Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 2500 cat foods, dog foods,  and pet treats.  30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. www.PetsumerReport.com


seal_175x154
The 2015 List

Susan’s List of trusted pet foods.  Click Here

 

Have you read Buyer Beware?  Click Here

Cooking for pets made easy, Dinner PAWsible

Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here

22 Comments

22 Comments

  1. Jennifer Holdt

    April 7, 2015 at 1:46 pm

    Go Susan! You keep fighting because in the long run, you know what you do means the world to us consumers. It takes a strong woman with a strong team of professionals to keep fighting for what is right! I personally value what you all do! Thank you for keeping up the good fight for the benefit and only the benefit of our fur- kids!
    I will always support you and what you do!
    Jennifer and my pack…
    Buddy, Cooper, Tooten and Rusty!

  2. Marge Mullen

    April 7, 2015 at 1:48 pm

    The old adage ” take it from wince it comes” is applicable here!!

  3. Pegg Bauer

    April 7, 2015 at 1:57 pm

    Follow the $$. Media is financed by advertising dollars. Big advertising dollars are paid by Big Pet Food – including those who are selling (and lying about) sick products as Beneful. Media isn’t gullible. Media is greedy, and members of the media no longer blink when feeding blatant untruths to their audiences.

  4. Kristi

    April 7, 2015 at 2:08 pm

    THANK YOU for your courageous work in bringing pet owners the TRUTH about pet food! Your pioneering heroic work has saved the lives of ours and thousands and thousands of pets thanks to the well researched information that you valiantly bring to light. High powered, aggressive industry opposition to the TRUTH about manufactured pet food in order to maintain and increase obscene profits (at the expense of quality, truth in advertising and ethical business practices) is a travesty of justice and human decency. Pet owners want the pet food industry and government regulators to step up to tell the truth about what is in pet food! We will continue to demand transparency in ingredients, ingredient quality, and non-toxicity. You go, girl! We’re behind you all the way!

  5. Hannie

    April 7, 2015 at 2:41 pm

    I will repeat: “You go, girl…..we’re behind you all the way”…….I admire all your moxie to stand up to the criticism & bashing because you know you are right. Those of us who have done research into pet food know you are right which is why we stand with you. It’s about time somebody spoke out about this travesty. Too many pets have suffered medical issues because none of us knew (for many yrs) exactly what we were feeding them.

    My Lab gets human food w/a touch of dry added in (only a couple that I trust, needless to say)……which is why she’s 10 yo & still very healthy.

  6. Peter

    April 7, 2015 at 3:00 pm

    An attack, in this case, is the sincerest form of flattery.

  7. Betty Burkett

    April 7, 2015 at 3:08 pm

    I am presently reading the book by Dr. Jean Dodds: Canine Nutrigenomics. It is amazing how much she is aware of so much of the information you have given to us all. I’m sure you have heard about the Truth..All truth goes through 3 stages: First it is ridiculed; then it is violently opposed; and finally, it is accepted as self-evident. (Arthur Schopenhauer 1778-1860) and by Sinclair Lewis-“It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon him not understanding it.”
    You are such a blessing to us and our pets. Thank you so very much for being there for us.

    • Dianne

      April 7, 2015 at 3:38 pm

      I love those quotes.

  8. Dianne

    April 7, 2015 at 3:47 pm

    Susan, of all the posts you have written, I think this one is perfect for carrying around and handing to anyone who says the food is tested by the government and the companies and must be safe. It is also a great example of what consumers are up against.

    But in this paragraph “And…How very sad that pet food consumers had to spend their own money to test pet food – found starting risks – and no regulatory authority lifts a finger to investigate.” did you mean startling?

    • Susan Thixton

      April 7, 2015 at 8:05 pm

      I did mean startling – thank you! Corrected.

  9. John Stone

    April 7, 2015 at 3:56 pm

    I don’t know how you can cope with being lied to 24/7 by regulators. It’s so depressing to me, and I’m only reading your accounts. I hope you stay strong, and that we all remember the names of those who forwarded this agenda of death and misery. They MUST be held accountable, no matter if it takes months or years.

    • cathy

      April 8, 2015 at 7:59 am

      we are a country based on lies and debt. how is that honorable or sustainable? and what to do about it?

  10. regina

    April 7, 2015 at 4:45 pm

    keep up the fantastic work!!!

  11. Barb

    April 7, 2015 at 5:25 pm

    Susan,
    Thank you so much for working so tirelessly on our behalf. It is reprehensible and beyond explanation that such nastiness, untruths, and personal bashing occurs because of your efforts to find truth in pet food products on the market.

  12. jb

    April 7, 2015 at 8:00 pm

    I am glad you are exposing these charlatans for what they are, Susan.

    I think they retaliate to side track you because you strike close to home, aka, THE TRUTH about this nasty industry.

    You have our, The Consumers’ SUPPORT.

    Keep up the good work of exposing the DIRT!

  13. Ellie

    April 7, 2015 at 9:31 pm

    I am quite sure that the pet food industry is already quite aware of the disgusting way they produce pet food and the horrible ingredients in it. Greed is an ugly thing.

  14. Cora Vandekar

    April 7, 2015 at 9:47 pm

    Susan, you are the best!!!!!!!

  15. Elizabeth Isbell

    April 7, 2015 at 10:11 pm

    Keep at it Susan. You’re doing a great job.

  16. Jennifer

    April 7, 2015 at 11:26 pm

    Thank you Susan!!! You are a guardian angel!

  17. Beth VanDusen

    April 8, 2015 at 9:45 am

    Keep up the great work! My feelings exactly! 🙂

  18. Terri Janson

    April 8, 2015 at 12:49 pm

    I too want to Thank you Susan and give you a big hug!!! I have tears in my eyes for how strong you are! My tears are happy ones!!! WE WILL WIN!

  19. Roger Biduk

    April 9, 2015 at 12:53 pm

    I would be hard-pressed to find more unethical entities than the pet food industry and the veterinary profession along with their member associations.

    It’s not rocket science… pet parents simply have to educate and inform themselves about the misinformation which is the medical-industrial complex marketing machine that generates annual quantum revenue of over $100billion+ / year which includes BigPharmaMafia combined with the veterinary industry which includes potentially dangerous, very low-quality commercial pet foods [i.e. veterinarian-sold prescription diets] along with bad, unethical and / or unknowledgeable veterinarians and the AVMA, AAHA, AAFP, NASPHV, AVA, BVA, CVMA, etc… all at the expense of the health of your beloved precious pets… and of course your bank account!!!

    Roger Biduk
    http://www.bestcatanddognutrition.com/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Learn More

Human Grade & Feed Grade
Do you know what the differences are between Feed Grade and Human Grade pet food? Click Here.

 

The Regulations
Pet Food is regulated by federal and state authorities. Unfortunately, authorities ignore many safety laws. Click Here to learn more about the failures of the U.S. pet food regulatory system.

 

The Many Styles of Pet Food
An overview of the categories, styles, legal requirements and recall data of commercial pet food in the U.S. Click Here.

 

The Ingredients
Did you know that all pet food ingredients have a separate definition than the same ingredient in human food? Click Here.

Click Here for definitions of animal protein ingredients.

Click Here to calculate carbohydrate percentage in your pet’s food.

 

Sick Pet Caused by a Pet Food?

If your pet has become sick or has died you believe is linked to a pet food, it is important to report the issue to FDA and your State Department of Agriculture.

Save all pet food – do not return it for a refund.

If your pet required veterinary care, ask your veterinarian to report to FDA.

Click Here for FDA and State contacts.

The List

The Treat List

Special Pages to Visit

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Click Here

Pet Food Recall History (2007 to present)
Click Here

Find Healthy Pet Foods Stores
Click Here

About TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

Friends of TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

You May Also Like

Pet Food News

The anti-healthy pet food folks are at it again. This time going after friend and fellow pet food consumer advocate Rodney Habib (with a...

Pet Food News

It is sad to report that the credibility our results have been attacked. And by someone who knows nothing of the two scientists that...

Pet Food News

This is the pre-announcement of our pet food test. Our results will be provided to a world of pet food consumers very soon. Some...

Pet Food News

One last plea for donations to our pet food testing project. We've got a week to go.