Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Pet Food Regulations

AAFCO January 2014 Meeting Day 2

Another AAFCO meeting accomplished. This report on the meetings is regarding our two significant AAFCO Committees – Ingredient Definitions and Pet Food.

Another AAFCO meeting accomplished. This report on the meetings is regarding our two significant AAFCO Committees – Ingredient Definitions and Pet Food.

First – and this could be the most significant step forward – the word ‘consumer’ was mentioned more at this AAFCO meeting than probably all other AAFCO meetings I’ve attended combined. They know we are here and are listening. Listening doesn’t necessarily mean we’ll see sweeping changes in pet food – but I believe the consumer perspective (wants and needs) is on the minds of pet food regulators. It probably is more ‘we’ll agree to disagree’ at this point, but the door is open. That’s a good thing – it’s progress.

The Pet Food Committee meeting discussed again this session the pending update to pet food nutrient profiles. The issue hanging is maximum calcium content of dog foods – ranging from 1.8% (of daily diet) to 2.5%. The lesser calcium maximum is suggested for growing large breed dogs (to slow the growth allowing bones to grow more naturally). During this discussion other nutrients were discussed in the pending nutrient profiles – so I took the (unpopular in the crowd) opportunity to bring up that these nutrient profiles are based on “commonly used” (and waste) ingredients and synthetic supplements not whole food nutrition. I stated that pet food is no longer a ‘one size fits all’ industry – and asked if the nutrient profiles were going to be looked at again, is consideration going to be given to nutrient requirements of pet foods that use whole food instead of supplements. My question didn’t get anywhere…but, the point was made. It’s all we have for now.

Another topic discussed again this meeting was carbohydrate statements on pet food labels. The hold up with this requirement to pet food labels is a scientific method to validate a pet food manufacturer carbohydrate statement. Backing up a bit – AAFCO meetings try to accomplish several things at one time. Regulations (which have to be accepted by each state) that pet food/animal feed manufacturers have to follow and a means for regulators – State Department of Agriculture Representatives – to discover and prove if manufacturers are abiding by the rules. So with the topic of carbohydrate statements on pet food labels – the concern is if it is required on a pet food label, how will regulators be able to determine if the manufacturer is telling the consumer the truth (about how much carbohydrates are actually included in a pet food).

One not so scientific method suggested is called Nitrogen Free Extract (NFE). And it is not as complicated as it sounds. To arrive at an estimate of carbohydrate content in any pet food add the ‘crude protein’ percentage, the ‘crude fat’ percentage, the minerals and ash content. Subtract this total from 100% (the entire pet food) and you are left with an estimate of carbohydrate content of the pet food.

Dr. Bill Burkholder of FDA discussed that FDA will no longer allow (on pet food labels) for multiple ingredients to be listed in parenthesis (excluding vitamins and minerals). So if you see in the ingredient list on a pet food or treat two or more ingredients in parenthesis – such as Chicken Product (chicken, liver, gizzards), know that the manufacturer of this pet food/treat is in violation of labeling laws (they aren’t following the rules!).

During the Pet Food Committee – Jill Franks who stated she was with Mars Petcare made a statement to the committee (to be honest, I don’t recall what that was – no matter, that’s not the point anyway). During the next session (Ingredient Definitions Session) I noticed that the very same Jill Franks sat down at the table at the front of the room (where committee advisers sit). When introductions were made of committee advisers to the crowd, she introduced herself as Jill Franks of Pet Food Institute. In other words, it appears that it is allowed for pet food manufacturer representatives to wear multiple hats at AAFCO meetings. One moment they can represent a manufacturer, another they can represent the lobby group for Big Pet Food. I don’t feel this is fair – especially considering that I worked for several years trying to become an adviser to these committees. It was only after our consumer association was formed (and months of investigation by AAFCO to be certain we really were a consumer association) that Mollie Morrissette and myself were given advisory positions. Not happy with this one.

Question…if you saw the term “Pulse Protein” or “Pulse Fiber” on a pet food ingredient list, do you know what that means? I didn’t – but it is now (or will be very soon) an approved pet food ingredient. ‘Pulse’ ingredients are lentils, various beans, chick peas, faba, and peas. For now, the only ‘pulse’ ingredient that will be allowed in pet foods are peas. But the stage is basically set for more pulse ingredients in the future. I’ll post the full definition of these ingredients soon. And there will be a Pulse Flour ingredient too.

We are heading home (yeah!) today. Mollie to California and me back to Florida. I will also try to post a explanation to all about how the entire AAFCO system works soon. It’s a little hard to explain. And watch PoisonedPets.com for Mollie’s post on her report of her very first AAFCO meeting. Will also send out to all Association for Truth in Pet Food members a report of the meeting – soon.

 

Wishing you and your pet(s) the best,

Susan Thixton
Pet Food Safety Advocate
Author Buyer Beware, Co-Author Dinner PAWsible
TruthaboutPetFood.com
Association for Truth in Pet Food

What’s in Your Pet’s Food?
Is your dog or cat eating risk ingredients?  Chinese imports?  Petsumer Report tells the ‘rest of the story’ on over 2500 cat foods, dog foods,  and pet treats.  30 Day Satisfaction Guarantee. www.PetsumerReport.com

Listimagesmall

 

2014 List
Susan’s List of trusted pet foods.  Click Here

 

Have you read Buyer Beware?  Click Here

Cooking for pets made easy, Dinner PAWsible

Find Healthy Pet Foods in Your Area Click Here

12 Comments

12 Comments

  1. Jackie

    January 10, 2014 at 9:31 am

    Thanks Susan, for being our voice, for your time and effort during this AFFCO meeting. You are our voice, of those of us who see our pets as family members. Truth On!

  2. Janice Alexander

    January 10, 2014 at 9:39 am

    Hi Susan, I am sure you have read Mad Cowboy by Howard Lyman. If not, it is unbelievable. This is the CATTLE RANCHER who was on Oprah show years ago and caused all the commotion from the Cattlemen Association. He is now a committed vegan and tells it all about the cattle industry. And the first pages are amazing. Any animal industry is not spared.
    Thanks for what you are doing.

  3. Pingback: FDA Pet Food Regulations--YOU CAN HELP!! - Dog Health & Nutrition - Dog Forums - I-Love-Dogs.com

  4. Sharon

    January 10, 2014 at 12:25 pm

    I am certainly more informed and my furry ones (5 cats & 2 dogs) certainly eat better for all your work. I’m moving toward a raw diet for our 10 month old English Creme Golden in puppy steps – I don’t want to start something without understanding how to achieve nutritional balance.

    In the meantime, I am particularly concerned about calcium since our 10 year old required double hip surgery before she was two. In a 1997 report by Henry J. Baker, DVM, Dietary Mineral Levels Affect Bone Development In Great Dane Pups, he concludes that, “the optimal diet for large and giant breed puppies appears to be lower in mineral content (similar to 0.8 percent calcium/0.67 percent phosphorus),…” That is half the maximum level of calcium that the AAFCO believes is acceptable – even their minimum is too high. This is one area where exceeding the AAFCO guidelines would mean lowering the calcium amount.

    Something I don’t understand is why the pet food industry can not determine the amount of carbohydrates included in their food when every manufacturer of human food can.

  5. Lori S.

    January 10, 2014 at 12:27 pm

    Thank you SO MUCH for going to the meetings and filling us in on what happens there.

  6. Emilie M Bottiggi (in TN)

    January 10, 2014 at 2:39 pm

    Susan, as usual, you are “spot on”. Thank you for your vigorous and consistent representation of us pet owners and lovers

  7. Christine

    January 10, 2014 at 4:46 pm

    Good work Susan.
    I was a little confused about your statement that lentils and chick peas aren’t yet allowed in pet food, but I’ve definitely seen red lentils in dry foods like Horizon’s “Pulsar”and chick peas in Dogswell’s “Nutrisca” and Canidae’s “Elements”, etc.

  8. Nina Wolf

    January 10, 2014 at 6:43 pm

    Conflict of interest, there, Jill? Sheesh. And yet, no one but you and Mollie bats an eyelash. We are so much better off for you being there, Susan and Mollie both, and for keeping an eye on things. Thanks for all you do!

  9. Michelle

    January 10, 2014 at 8:56 pm

    Pulse Protein or Pulse Fiber? Why not just call them peas, lentils and chick peas? This industry kills me. Thanks for all you do!

  10. K.Tanabe DVM

    January 10, 2014 at 9:48 pm

    You and Mollie can never be requited.
    We, Japanese Petsumers, can’t thank you enough.
    I am sure both of you made a significant contribution toward the welfare of beloved animals.
    I will try to give both of you behind-the-scene support, and try to translate your reports into Japanese as soon as possible on my “truthaboutpetfood.jp” site.
    Thank you very much Susan and Mollie.

  11. Carol Lobmeier

    January 11, 2014 at 7:38 am

    Thank you for all you do for us and our fu

  12. Peter

    January 11, 2014 at 8:18 am

    Requiring manufacturers to disclose carbohydrate levels in pet foods would be an important change. AAFCO postures that consumers aren’t interested: (2003, p.178), “Carbohydrate guarantees are no longer considered as necessary or meaningful for purchaser information, therefore, their use is discouraged.”). They didn’t ask me. Or anyone I know who is struggling to control their pet’s weight. AAFCO is just a voluntary commercial enterprise and I do not regard AAFCO “approval” as meaningful on a label.

Leave a Reply

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Learn More

Human Grade & Feed Grade
Do you know what the differences are between Feed Grade and Human Grade pet food? Click Here.

 

The Regulations
Pet Food is regulated by federal and state authorities. Unfortunately, authorities ignore many safety laws. Click Here to learn more about the failures of the U.S. pet food regulatory system.

 

The Many Styles of Pet Food
An overview of the categories, styles, legal requirements and recall data of commercial pet food in the U.S. Click Here.

 

The Ingredients
Did you know that all pet food ingredients have a separate definition than the same ingredient in human food? Click Here.

Click Here for definitions of animal protein ingredients.

Click Here to calculate carbohydrate percentage in your pet’s food.

 

Sick Pet Caused by a Pet Food?

If your pet has become sick or has died you believe is linked to a pet food, it is important to report the issue to FDA and your State Department of Agriculture.

Save all pet food – do not return it for a refund.

If your pet required veterinary care, ask your veterinarian to report to FDA.

Click Here for FDA and State contacts.

The List

The Treat List

Special Pages to Visit

Subscribe to our Newsletter
Click Here

Pet Food Recall History (2007 to present)
Click Here

Find Healthy Pet Foods Stores
Click Here

About TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

Friends of TruthaboutPetFood.com
Click Here

You May Also Like

Pet Food Regulations

Another AAFCO meeting is about to start.

Pet Food Regulations

Without alerting consumers, AAFCO is about to change human grade pet food.

Pet Food Regulations

Another AAFCO meeting begins. Same old story - industry celebrated, consumers forgotten.

Pet Food Regulations

In one week we'll be attending another AAFCO meeting and talking with FDA. Your input on issues requested.